Quote ="FearTheVee"Wigan could easily have paid Ashton that contract if they wanted to, they chose to offer him peanuts. Ashton signed for Northampton in March 2007. In the following off season Wigan then signed Andy Coley, Richie Mathers, George Carmont and Karl Pryce, with Tim Smith and Cameron Phelps signing mid-season.
Are you seriously suggesting that had Ashton been offered the salaries of Pryce/Smith/Phelps/Mathers combined (all of whom were flops or struggled to get game time) he'd have left for the money? Wigan made a commercial decision not to offer Ashton more than they thought he was worth.
When union were sniffing around Eastmond, Saints considered him worthy of big enough money to get him to sign a new deal. Wigan didn't with Ashton.
No doubt union will come sniffing around Eastmond again at the end of next season and Saints will have another decision to make. If Saints say they can't compete then go and sign the likes of Smith/Pryce/Phelps/Mathers to play in our reserves, I'll be a little bit miffed.'"
firstly hindsight is a wonderful thing we didn't sign flops deliberately, secondly Ashton was offered a very good deal for a young lad and paying him substantially more than his peers would at best damage team morale and at worst set a chain in motion with all our young lads trying to get offers from union in order to talk their value up, wouldn't be too tricky for some of them. We were hardly world beaters when Ashton was at the club, we had some tremendous performances from him personally and some poor ones too, he seemed to have a bit of an attitude problem which Northampton Saints discovered when he was in his 2nd season for them, he was great in the first year when all was going good for him. Could we really afford the risk of being 3 men down on the squad to accommodate him? doubtful! 3 years on we are Super League Champs with Sam, Richards and Roberts (for a short period due to injury) all among the best fullbacks in Super League, Chris Ashton would not have made the slightest difference to our teams performances under Noble and we're managing to move on from the days of one or two players earning a fortune and have a large squad of players the vast majority of whom (as Sinfield described the Leeds side on SL supermen) play for the club they love regardless of the fact they could well earn more money elsewhere.
Perhaps if St Helens hadn't decided to pay Eastmond a fortune to keep him 'loyal' you may well have had a larger squad and been able to cope with the injuries you've been moaning about all season.
If anyone demands a massive wage increase to stop them going to union let them go, if the club's youth system is good enough they will produce more players who will learn through excellent team spirit and motivation that they're playing for their teammates, fans and managers, not just for the money.