if we played as GB we could surely pick Richards-how good would that be

Totally agree with that mate: Pat should be included in that btw. The GB has always been predominantly English players, but expansion purposes I think GB should have been kept. The other three are still a long way from producing three inernational teams IMHO.

Its a joke he has no qualifications or success to soeak of if anything he had took Bradford backwards

Hopefully then when he is sacked by the RFL (by Xmas probably) the only way for England is up.

Quote ="those were the days"Ye that was played on a tue/wed night which made it a better effort from both sets of fans that day.'" No it wasn't. It was a Bank holiday Monday IIRC. The Weds night game was the 12-12 draw when Lowes and Faz were binned for fighting. EDIT: - Was actually bank holiday Sunday wigan.rlfans.com/fusion_pages/in ... age_id=152

Quote ="those were the days"Ye that was played on a tue/wed night which made it a better effort from both sets of fans that day.'" No it wasn't. It was a Bank holiday Monday IIRC. The Weds night game was the 12-12 draw when Lowes and Faz were binned for fighting. EDIT: - Was actually bank holiday Sunday wigan.rlfans.com/fusion_pages/in ... age_id=152

England v Australia sounds like RU or cricket. Great Britain v Australia sounds like the real deal. I defo think for marketing purposes being England doesn't sell as many seat because it 'doesn't sound Rugby League'