|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2011 | May 2010 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| None of these players should be at Wigan.
Phil Bailey is stealing a living over here - Why he played him against Leeds is beyond me - Penalty machine... You could have a young Wigan lad in that side do the exact same job as him, give away less penalties whilst gaining experience - Again, he's stealing a living, send him back home.
Paul Prescott - Rubbish - Not fit to play at Wigan... He's unreliable & not quick enough for the way we play, he's just a big gormless looking waste of space.
Pryce - Same as prescott, he should have played Goulding on Saturday - Pryce didn't do much wrong in that game but there's no way he's a winger.
Bad side chosen to play against Leeds IMO, that, and bad tactics (kicking for 2 rather than running at them) is what lost us that game... Wasn't the Wigan we've seen playing in the Super League.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 1661 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2018 | Oct 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| On the face of it Paul hasn't kicked on this season as much as others, but he's a 24 year old prop with a lot of experience, not a lot of them around, why throw him away now we have done all this work with him and let someone else benefit? Other than 2 errors (in a game with 20+ penalties) he had a good game on Saturday. Wane appears to rate him. Also isn't he still at University, in which case he may well kick on further once that has finished.
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7439 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="The Ducks Eyebrows"None of these players should be at Wigan.
Phil Bailey is stealing a living over here - Why he played him against Leeds is beyond me - Penalty machine... You could have a young Wigan lad in that side do the exact same job as him, give away less penalties whilst gaining experience - Again, he's stealing a living, send him back home.
Paul Prescott - Rubbish - Not fit to play at Wigan... He's unreliable & not quick enough for the way we play, he's just a big gormless looking waste of space.
Pryce - Same as prescott, he should have played Goulding on Saturday - Pryce didn't do much wrong in that game but there's no way he's a winger.
Bad side chosen to play against Leeds IMO, that, and bad tactics (kicking for 2 rather than running at them) is what lost us that game... Wasn't the Wigan we've seen playing in the Super League.
'"
I've seen two of your posts. 1 from January, which you 'guaranteed' a Wigan 6match losing streak, claiming MM and SW had just made them run a little more.
That kinda went to pot didn't it?
And now I read this. Although before I dis-credit you, I actually agree regarding Prescott and Pryce. However, until the off-season they're fine where they are.
Seriously pal, you need to get behind the team. It's fickle fans like you who breed negativeness around the place, around these boards, one loss and it's a crisis, one win and we're world beaters. I am under the impression that that fits your character moulding. For crying out loud we are TOP OF THE SUPER LEAGUE 4 BLOODY POINTS CLEAR!! So what if Pryce or Prescott need to go, so what if Bailey is, well whatever you decided to say about him, can you not just be positive instead of finding a crack and turning it into a canyon?
Rant finished.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 15457 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Dec 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Bailey - I'm usually critical of him but I thought he had an excellent first half, racked up loads of tackles, he did well making the hard yards too, in the second half I didn't notice him much. That was his kind of game where it's all up the middle, it's the pacey teams that can exploit him. Assuming Hansen's still out I'd leave Bailey in the team, even though I said I wouldn't have played him v Leeds.
Prescott - He's fairly average, he's worth the spot at the moment though until we either get some bodies back or Davies steps it up another level, not sure whether he'll make it at Wigan long term. Talking of props I really wish Maguire would give Paleaaesina a few consecutive games, I can only assume he's not training well or Maguire doesn't believe in the idea of an impact prop.
Pryce - In attack he looked very sluggish, he really isn't making any friends by jogging in ball returns. However, I still think he's the better option than Goulding because even though Goulding might score a try or two more Pryce is a better defender, even if they didn't really run at him at the weekend. Leave him in next week, just hope they have a word about returning the ball with some urgency.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4722 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Jukesays"Up there in the top of the Most ridiculous statements of the year so far, Well done!'"
nice constructive response...well done yourself
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2088 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Nov 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| After watching the game again on iPlayer, I think Prescott actually had a very good game overall and isn't deserving of so much criticism. There wasn't much difference in the amount of metres the forwards were making because of the conditions, but he put plenty of effort in, stood up well to some big tackles, put Tomkins through a gap with a good pass which on a dry day could have seen him squeeze through and in defence he was one of the best on the pitch.
He made 30 tackles in the game which is second only to O'Loughlin, and his metres made were decent compared to the other forwards.
Fielden is the one who put in the sub standard performance in that game. It was his worst of the season so far.
Pryce coped well in a difficult game but he wasn't exactly error free. Early on a cross field kick came over to him and whilst my impression at the game was he blocked Donald to follow it into touch after watching the game again he wanted absolutely nothing to do with it and could have been caught out.
He also gave Donald way too much space towards the end of the game by moving inside and off his man, something other players have been slated for plenty of times. Had the pass been a good one Donald had an easy walk in but the pass went straight to touch.
There's still a lot for him to work on, but I hope he retains his place in the side because he keeps improving with each game and there are promising signs for the future. Hopefully he's on his way to fulfilling his potential. If he works on aspects of his game in the same way others have this year then there should be much more to come.
| | |
| |
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2025 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
|
|