The way Saints played highlighted Leeds' total inability to control the ruck meaning the majority of Saints attack was in the middle third of the pitch. The muppets on sky loved the speed of the game but quite frankly the skill on display was limited to scooting.Compare their tries to most of ours this season, what would fans prefer? Incidentally why do the refs still not notice when Cunningham does his trademark sideways run from dummy half followed by a pass a yard forward to put someone in for a try?
The way Saints played highlighted Leeds' total inability to control the ruck meaning the majority of Saints attack was in the middle third of the pitch. The muppets on sky loved the speed of the game but quite frankly the skill on display was limited to scooting.Compare their tries to most of ours this season, what would fans prefer? Incidentally why do the refs still not notice when Cunningham does his trademark sideways run from dummy half followed by a pass a yard forward to put someone in for a try?
The way Saints played highlighted Leeds' total inability to control the ruck meaning the majority of Saints attack was in the middle third of the pitch. The muppets on sky loved the speed of the game but quite frankly the skill on display was limited to scooting.Compare their tries to most of ours this season, what would fans prefer? Incidentally why do the refs still not notice when Cunningham does his trademark sideways run from dummy half followed by a pass a yard forward to put someone in for a try?
The way Saints played highlighted Leeds' total inability to control the ruck meaning the majority of Saints attack was in the middle third of the pitch. The muppets on sky loved the speed of the game but quite frankly the skill on display was limited to scooting.Compare their tries to most of ours this season, what would fans prefer? Incidentally why do the refs still not notice when Cunningham does his trademark sideways run from dummy half followed by a pass a yard forward to put someone in for a try?
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
