Fulham FC took 433 fans to Newcastle at the start of the season and about the same number v sunderland. That's on an average home attendance of about 25,000 (although a hell of a lot of those are away fans and tourists). Which is probably about the same percentage of Broncos fans that travel.

So not many people passionate enough to follow the team then?

I only posted it because you said football clubs - even with a low following - take more away than we do. Which perhaps isn't always true.

One season in a premier game there were 68 Wigan football fans at White hart Lane to see Wigan play Spurs.

Wigan FC have no fans shocker

Or not one trick ponies, or a varied and interesting life

Either Darthchris has been fishing on this thread and caught quite a haul, or the amount of beer he has consumed during 2011 to get over watching Harlequins RL home and away has destroyed several of his brain cells

Another 3 wishes from me : Robbo and Rodney actually turn up, Hickey loses about 3 stone and Craig Gower stays off the beer.

Wasn't that the season after they lost 9-1 to Spurs?

Think it was that game. I believe the club compensated the fans travel costs.

Ha,



Nah, just people on here saying they are too busy and have better things to do than watch us play hardly inspires confidence in us attracting new fans going forward

I wouldn't say most of the things I do on Sundays are better than watching London RL, but I would say most of the things I do are better than travelling 7-8 hours to do so.