Disagreed with you, did he?

Cowgirl should start a thread calling him out.

Patronising it may be but micky genuinely seems not to know any better.

However if I called out every apologist/barrack room lawyer that deserved it there would no room for them to say how great the owner is.

Fair's fair after all.

Trust me - it is possible to believe that David Hughes has run this club poorly AND believe that you're a complete tool

If I'm the tool why are you so keen to hang on to him?

You're always making such a big play about me not being able to fund the club personally but you're a rock star ain't ya?

Surely you could afford to rent a park pitch?

Would love to be a rock star. In fact, it's an expensive hobby. Much like owning an RL club, but without the trolls

Nobody's keen to hang on to him.
Nobody's got the cash to buy him out.
Have you?

I had a listen to your band on Deezer.

By my reckoning that's 0.0002 pence towards buying out the current hobbyist.



BTW fair play for acknowledging what Hughes is.

An admission beyond most apologists.

Give it a rest with the apologist thing, no one on here is an apologist, most of us are just realists get over it

A realist would have done with the club entirely like the missing 3,000 fans Hughes alienated.

You're an apologist.

& I'm a satirist.

I hope you don't mind a bit of friendly advice, but I thought I should let you know that satire is intended to be funny. Oh, and thanks for listening to my band

Well I was joking about the satire.

Broncos are more knockabout farce.

If they are so bad why do you keep harping on about email? Until you can change it give over whining about it.

You really are a sad pathetic piece of work.
Here's the deal.
You make one more negative pointless post and the thread ends there.
We are NOT going to be part of your agenda.
The moderators will also be informed

I wonder if this is the post the moderators should be concerned about?

Well apparently I drag the forum down with negativity.

Whereas personal abuse & threats of legal action are to be applauded in return.

You couldn't make this stuff up except Ronniequin does on a regular basis.

Like that lie about me posting night & day.

Last post 9 ,91 am previous 9 08 pm that's day and night.
The issue is in yr opinion anyone supporting the club are effectively commiting some heinous crime and stuffing the owners pockets with cash
Who has made personal threats against you? Who has threatened legal action?
Negativity is certainly not against the AUP so crack on but don't be surprised when folk are negative towards you.
If your view of any supporter of the club is that they are an apologist so what, that's yr view, most folk call it being a fan of a club.
You have stated often enough you are not going to support the club this year, so if that's the case why do you persist in annoying us who are.

When the barrack room lawyer accused me of posting night and day I had been nowhere near this place for over 24 hours. Too busy enjoying some freebies at the weekend.





You can do whatever you like with your money. But IMO that's rewarding stupidity on the part of the owner.



I take it you've got Ronniequin on ignore?



Tell Ronniequin that. Every time he breaches it in reply.



Again tell Ronniequin as he purports to speak on your behalf.


I've stated often enough that I won't support the club monetarily.

A stance that I will maintain whilst the current owner is in place.

That must be Gobs first post in 5 years and welcome it was

Since when did you make the rules. The repetitive posting on both sides is tedious and largely inane but if that's what folks want to post it is really up to them. There is an ignore button. I might use it on you.

Cowgirl, back on page 18 you accused us of wanting to hang on to David Hughes, and I responded:I notice that you ignored the question, was it too difficult for you to think up a trolling response? Why don't you try answering it this time?

Where do i find the ignore button?

In response to Perry I don't have the money to buy out Hughes personally but a fan owned collective could do at least as good as that serial failure.

The fact is "fans" like you aren't interested in that option.

So you're apologists by default

So how much do you expect each fan to contribute?

Wow.

I think you need to see a psychiatrist and get prescribed some medication if this is how you react to somebody on the internet posting messages about a second tier rugby league team.