Come on chissitt. Where did maple syrup say we were signing brough. Or are you a liar?

I think us Wakefield fans need a whip round to get GiantJo laid ! Fookin 'ell talk about frustration..........seriously needs a good explosion to chill

Fair play. But Sadly the Giants did not often beat mere plumber 52 - 0 on their own ground. Even for plumbers and part timers to be nilled at home would be humiliating. So would conceding 52 points to the visiting side. Thankfully when we did own a poor team like that it was not televised live by Sky.

We can still only beat what's in fromt of us I suppose

Some people are suggesting Brough has been "tapped up" and that Wakey are using this as a bargaining tool to drive a better deal for Brough.
If the evidence is there and sufficent to drive a better deal,then surely this evidence would be sufficent to hand over to the RFL.

If its not sufficent evidence to give to the RFL,then i cant believe that it would be sufficient to drive a better deal out of Huddersfield.

If Wakey are using the evidence to drive a better deal,we are no better than Huddersfield,we are protecting them and ensuring no one is punished for breaking the rules.

Hence i believe the "tapping up" rumours are codswallop

By Wakey standards the RL content of that post is very high. Well done

Hahaha....oh Jo ! RELAX.....3 finger shuffle should calm you down !

I bet your either a science teacher or work in a library ?



UP THE GIANTS !

You know, I think we should just play "Brough ping pong" for the rest of his career. Both clubs can alternately tap him up and pay him ten million dollars a year while the other club gets a back hander the size of Ant McPartlin's forehead for keeping shtum with the RFL. Brough can keep himself busy changing between the 'saviour of the human race' and 'prince of darkness' costumes on a fortnightly basis. I'll buy the popcorn.

There is an important omission we need to know? Toffee or salted popcorn?

Send her round to mine, I'll to my bit for the team!

Of course they are, cos if you found out that DB was being tapped up (so a.n. other club started the ball rolling and WTW have done nothing wrong) then you would just go to the RFL and get said club fined at absolutley no benefit to WTW at all! and DB would probably still go at the end of the season anyway





Or you could say to a.n.other club, we know what you've been doing and if we report you, you will recieve a BIG fine. Maybe you should pay us and save tarnishing the name of your club







ffs.........wake up man. Of course this is purely hypothetical

TURFEDOUT is a Wakefield fan, you clot!

You should work for Gordon Brown with that spin doctory.

Both. I'm feeling frisky so I'll even chuck in a giant bag of Revels too!!

Big or family pack???

Coffee Revels are the devils spawn. The deals =#FF0000off.

I know who he is

That's a bit rude about a fellow fan.

So you're suggesting that Wakefield are willing to commit a serious criminal offence ie Blackmail and obtaining money through menaces simply to try and squeeze a few extra pounds out of the Giants?

I went for the interview, but apparently I get too close to the truth

Is that what he calls his 'tootle'?

You obviously didn't notice the last word of my post

I didn't take any notice of the first word either, nor any words inbetween. With good reason.

Aitchteeaitch.

That hypothetical would have legs if it was cobbled up between a couple of ill informed 7 year olds. I suspect even Ted is better than that?

First the ignorance of RL fines is touching. a BIG fine (note the capitalisation so we mean really big!) is a nonsense. The fines in RL are low. When wakey tapped up Robinson it was only a few thousand. And usually 50% is deffered. Jeez KD would be terrified by a BIG RL fine. So even on its own ludicrous terms this hypothetical stinks.

Plus, of course, wakey have gone public about the talks. They have been clear about the correct nature of the approach.To run to the RFL afterwards claiming bad practice does make them look 2 faced. So again this is an infantile case.

Try again. This time with more mature and informed reasoning.

Is Ed Balls a politician or a Brown euphemism?