That pretty much sums it all up, it must be true then

Why would he appeal when he pleased Guilty?

And the lowest form of wit is..

Small club with a small club mentality won over a top class rugby team last weekend. I cry for the game when thugs and wind up merchants like Huddersfield can beat a top team like Wigan. No wonder B Hodgson is leaving to play for a real rugby team.

There there. Feel better for that?

Cry for the game indeed! I cry for you; tears of laughter!

'A player as dirty as Mason'
it is always great when you confuse facts with your own ignorant opinions.
I have just checked back to 2003 (which covers his entire career other than his spell at Wakefield) and that is his first ever yellow card. He also has one red card back in 2007 but that is hardly the record of a dirty player. His penalties conceeded are not overly excessive for a forward either.

You are Stuart Fielden and I claim my £5

Well its been pointed out on here how Dirty Joel Tomkins is. Hes been Sin Binned once and that was for dissent and never been sent off not bad for a Dirty player!

But he does lead the penalty count by some margin doesnt he.

Tompkins is giving away a massive amount of penalties though unlike Mason. I wouldn't say he is dirty though he maybe just needs to work on his discipline.

you cant really go by penalties when classing someone as a dirty player seeing as they could just be for laying on or being offside i dont think tompkins is a dirty player at all not compaired to people like ryan bailey i think tompkins is just a bit green still

Whereas O'Loughlin is a dirty player and rarely gets penalised for it.

Now I will agree with you thoroughly on this!





In your opinion!!

.....and mine !!

Well, naturally. Otherwise we'd have been saying it wasn't late at all, wouldn't we?

Unless that's what you're suggesting, of course. If a Huddersfield fan was happy it wasn't late, then I'd be happy to say that ok, you're right, and no penalty should have been given at all. Even though I disagree.

Nowt like stating the obvious, of course every Wigan fan would say that, there isnt a more one eyed set of fans in the game

It was late, it ended up high, it wasnt called for, penalty at the time was good enough for me

And as I said, IF we were so "one-eyed", we would have said it wasn't late at all. We conceeded that it was late and got the penalty it deserved.



See your PM.

No doubt you have sent a selection of pictures of an incident that, when shown in full as a clip, show a very late and high hit on Robinson. Predictable, transparent and biased stuff from the supposedly unbiased Wigan fans, who think being a big club entitles them to do as they please, be above the laws of the game and to tanty like good 'uns when they lose as they have done all week.

No, I sent him a selection of pictures of the moment of impact of a slightly late hit to Robinson's chest.



LOL!!!



Even more LOL!!

Unfortunately you picked on the wrong Wigan fan, I AM unbiased, and call for discipline from all quarters of Rugby League, including my own club. Unfortunately you are so predictable, transparent and biased you can't see it, and some of your fans even dare to stick up for Mason's exceptionally dirty play. How you can have the nerve to say we're biased is frankly staggering.

And why exactly would we "tanty" as you put it?

We lost by two points, despite many many decisions going against us. A team that should have been down to 12 men (Mason, obviously). Partly our fault, obviously, as we lowered our game to your level instead of forcing you to rise to meet us.

It was probably Wigan's worst performance of the year, and one of Huddersfield's best... yet still you won by only 2 points?

Personally I take heart from that, not "tanty". Mason got what he deserved (well, some of), and I suspect you will drop below us in the fairplay index, where you belong, especially with a coach who has announced he is an advocate of thuggism.

It is good to see the Wigan-trained contingent of your club are doing so well.

LOL!

The prosecution rests having had the accused hang himself on their behalf!





Keep on digging! With every extra word you're only confirming everything, so you keep on going!

But quite clearly delusional if you think you are unbiased and then write the rest of your post.

ah but.. ....

small club that has beaten a top class rugby team on their own ground in the last 3 years! not to mention the victories at our home ground in the last 10 years!
small club who have appeared in more cup finals than top class rugby team in the last 5 years!
small club who have finished the regular season higher than top class rugby team in 2 of the last 4 seasons

So you agreed with me and still arguing with me

Pretty pictures, seen em a million times, still ended up high, you missed a couple out in the sequence

not wanting to pour fuel on this fire but i think you have just proved in that statement that you are biased and wear cherry and white goggles and are indeed still chewing on those sour grapes !!

Actually, you agreed with me and still called me and every other Wigan fan "one-eyed". If we share the same point of view, then you are also one-eyed by definition, surely?



Actually, no, I didn't. They are the moment before impact where you can see O'Loughlin's arms across his own chest, and the moment of impact where they hit Luke Robinson... in the chest.

Only the biased Huddersfield fans thought it was high. If you claim I've missed some out, prove it.





Ah, that old chestnut. You can't actually dispute any of my points, so instead go for the fallicious reasoning that anyone who argues with you is biased. What you fail to realise (or hope that everyone else forgets) is that the level of your bias is such that anyone who ISN'T biased is going to argue with what you say.

I suggest you take your calls of bias to the people who claimed Mason hadn't done anything wrong.




Why? Wigan played badly, correct, Huddersfield played well, correct, Mason should have been sent off, correct, the Wigan-raised part of your team combined very well especially for Robinson's try, correct, and you only won by two points, correct... what is biased about those statements of fact?

Unless you want to argue that Wigan were fantastic, or Huddersfield were terrible, or Mason didn't do anything wrong, or the likes of Brown, Wild, Hodgson and Robinson are terrible players or that you won by 20?

No? Thought not somehow.