Quote ="GiantJake1988"Yes code your right I'm sorry. After thinking about it again when Seb went off we really stepped it up, we really got on top of the forward battle and we looked like the better team.
What's your reason why when Taai and Seb went off last week and when Seb went off this week we got battered in the forwards????
If you think having 1 or 2 good props and rest workmans is enough we are going to lose more than we win - especially if Taai or Seb get injurys.
I've not written Wakeman off but he was poor again tonight I did not see any improvement on last week if I'm honest'"
Slough was decent, does a lot in defence, he is a willing but not barnstorming ball carrier. Rapira was much better than last week. Wakeman should get a little more time to adjust, but Mason should be strongly considered to come in for him.
We started well, then Walsh's big forwards got a bit of momentum, but our forwards proved fitter, last 30 minutes our pack looked strong and Walsh's were knackered. Our forwards generally looked like athletes, Wakey forwards less so, in fact they reminded me of our pack last year under Anderson, plenty of size but lacking fitness/stamina.
While there were key moments when things could have gone against us I do not think we were lucky to win at all, we were the better side for at least 50 minutes. It was not a classic performance, but to me it was encouraging. A step in the right direction.