I get the fact that you dont agree with me - and quite a few of your own fans when I've spoken to the more

If you look back through the thread. I was only agreeing with one of your own on Cudjoe's defensive shortcomings.

I,ve explained how I see it too. your right edge is always vulnerable, mostly due to your Captain's suspect tackling technique.
Tell you what - we'll agree to disagree and I just hope RS hasn't managed to improve his defence when you play us.

All the best for the rest of the season.

seen the taai tackle on replays

just going in for a big hit, are players not allowed anymore? not taai fault he was going down at the time just getting tackled milli seconds before, surely accidental

You just know that if there was no injury there that wouldn't have even warranted a look! Well precedent set now- so expect it to get brought up for similar tackles not charged!

yeh can only think taai has got the ban because of an injury sustained by accident

And the way Webster spat his dummy. Yet not one single wakey player raised even an eyebrow!

No complaints with the 1 game it's the way of the world these days that any injury sustained is taken into account firstly with the actual incident secondary, all i've read from Wakey fans is about the injury that has been or could have been caused rather than the actual tackle. That's how it goes these days as it seems if a player gets injured it is automatically labelled foul play.
I guess we would be the same if it was one of ours ....

It doesn't help when coaches as well as fans keep drawing attention to any injury caused rather than what actually happened, they hear the coaches say stuff like "i've got a lad in there with a bust nose" and suddenly demand the culprit is hung, drawn and quartered even if it's innocuous.

Don't think Ukuma went into that tackle meaning to injure the lad, he just hit him in the wrong place with the wrong part of the body, wasn't premeditated or malicious just unlucky for both parties really