Worrying thing is that it was plain as day for Dicky too but something made him not give it? no idea what but something obviously made him see a no try?

Maybe we may get a statement ?

Quote ="FLYINGPROP"Worrying thing is that it was plain as day for Dicky too but something made him not give it? no idea what but something obviously made him see a no try? Maybe we may get a statement ?'" Not a statement as such but Raleigh in Examiner saying it was a nailed on try: www.examiner.co.uk/huddersfield- ... -26458846/

Quote ="FLYINGPROP"Worrying thing is that it was plain as day for Dicky too but something made him not give it? no idea what but something obviously made him see a no try? Maybe we may get a statement ?'" Not a statement as such but Raleigh in Examiner saying it was a nailed on try: www.examiner.co.uk/huddersfield- ... -26458846/

Exactly!!! No way did his ball carrying arm touch the ground but are we really surprised Silverfish didn't give it? If ever there was a case for video refs at every game then that was was it. Why do we always seem to get the old codgers as touch judges too who can't see anything beyond their noses and serve as no purpose to the game what so ever?

Well I must admit that up until yesterday I thought their sole purpose was to raise their flags if the ball went between the posts for a conversion/penalty but watching them get that wrong yesterday I'm unsure as to what their actual role in the game is?

A mobile indication as to roughly where the touchline is?