I think we was stupid to appeal the outcome the last game of middle 8s could of been important or even the million pound game he been one of our better players when not been banned

Yes Prop.As far I'm aware additional banning should be based on the outcome of the injured person in question..As there wasn't any injured party,I'm not sure how they can add more without reading the laws of the game.

Read your original post, and then try to make sense of it, before you call anybody an idiot, oh brainy one!

www.rugby-league.com/article/505 ... ton-appeal Incredible!

www.rugby-league.com/article/505 ... ton-appeal Incredible!

and folk wonder why some cry conspiracy

We do wonder. The appeal was heard by an independent tribunal.
One of whom is a players who's career was cut short by a serious back injury. - it appears they think the Original disciplinary were too lenient!

I wonder if the JP knows one end of a rugby ball from the other

Quote ="propforward 2338"I wonder if the JP knows one end of a rugby ball from the other'" His name is Barry Lilley, I wonder if this is Him? he was once chairman of Hull Kr? www.independent.co.uk/sport/rugb ... 91798.html

Quote ="propforward 2338"I wonder if the JP knows one end of a rugby ball from the other'" His name is Barry Lilley, I wonder if this is Him? he was once chairman of Hull Kr? www.independent.co.uk/sport/rugb ... 91798.html

Take it your not talking about Danny Sculthorpe?

The tribunal increased the sentence due to the fact the appeal was a joke. They have done this before when clubs have appealed against an open and shut case. Why we appealed is beyond me when we knew that it was almost guaranteed the sentence would get increased.

Quote ="Cokey"His name is Barry Lilley, I wonder if this is Him? he was once chairman of Hull Kr? www.independent.co.uk/sport/rugb ... 91798.html'" Would that not be a conflict of interests him being on the panel.Danny Sculthorpe wouldn't do us any favours either

Quote ="Cokey"His name is Barry Lilley, I wonder if this is Him? he was once chairman of Hull Kr? www.independent.co.uk/sport/rugb ... 91798.html'" Would that not be a conflict of interests him being on the panel.Danny Sculthorpe wouldn't do us any favours either

So should we appeal cases or just leave them? The majority were saying to appeal them early on in the season. Possibly the club are giving Acton every opportunity available before the bullet.

Quote ="propforward 2338"Would that not be a conflict of interests him being on the panel.Danny Sculthorpe wouldn't do us any favours either'" Yah it would prop. Looks like a nasty piece of work this fella. Read the next to last paragraph in this link. upthecream.co.uk/why-no-hull-fc- ... o-stay-up/

Quote ="propforward 2338"Would that not be a conflict of interests him being on the panel.Danny Sculthorpe wouldn't do us any favours either'" Yah it would prop. Looks like a nasty piece of work this fella. Read the next to last paragraph in this link. upthecream.co.uk/why-no-hull-fc- ... o-stay-up/

Quote ="Cokey"Yah it would prop. Looks like a nasty piece of work this fella. Read the next to last paragraph in this link. upthecream.co.uk/why-no-hull-fc- ... o-stay-up/'" Nasty to say the least

Quote ="Cokey"Yah it would prop. Looks like a nasty piece of work this fella. Read the next to last paragraph in this link. upthecream.co.uk/why-no-hull-fc- ... o-stay-up/'" Nasty to say the least

Now thats a loose cannon..

Quote ="Cokey"Yah it would prop. Looks like a nasty piece of work this fella. Read the next to last paragraph in this link. upthecream.co.uk/why-no-hull-fc- ... o-stay-up/'" Not reet Cokey..

Quote ="Cokey"Yah it would prop. Looks like a nasty piece of work this fella. Read the next to last paragraph in this link. upthecream.co.uk/why-no-hull-fc- ... o-stay-up/'" Not reet Cokey..

I've long had my doubts about the RFL, it's akin to what was the "old farts" RU had before it modernised itself and really took off as a sport.
These kind of Banana republic decisions just underline just how bad things are.

Short term as a club we use this as motivation for the 8's, we have a good enough squad so let's now start to play.
Long term there needs to be enough progressive owners to force change at the RFL as what we have is a not fit for purpose old boys network that needs ripping apart.

Jamie will have a long break and be ready to prove all his doubters wrong next season and start to erase the huge smear the RFL have put on him.
The 4 month "ban" is not worthy of comment as to do so would give those on the panel(s) credit and they are not worthy of that.

I know, ah well.

BTW - Can i trouble you to put on, an updated matrix layout of the middle 8s? Cheers.

You appeal if you have new evidence that prooves the original decision was incorrect. Every suspension we've had this season was correct. The only people who have been saying we need to appeal the decisions are those who have been using their cherry & white hearts rather than their rational heads!

The thing is though is that the appeal was against the length of ban,he pleaded guilty to the offence. He has now been punished the same as Ben Flower.

unbelievable

So would you keep him or not, given our position and future status?

No

Glad you posted Budge..

Just a thought, If this occurred on the last game of the 8s, Would they have given him 4 months then?



BTW - I would keep him.

Ive just seen the video and cant see what he's actually done wrong its a physical game , to me its no different than 2 players squaring up , its nit like there was intent to cause harm , bit careless yes but nothin I havent seen a thousand times.