He has been sin binned this year, however when he received his 11 match ban (in total) last year he was neither sent off nor sin binned

How many other players have received such treatment? his only bans are coming curtesy of the review panel, its only two weeks since he was in the Super League team of the week


He cost our team nothing on Friday and contributed a great deal


Why do our own fans keep criticising him when we should be asking what opponents are getting away with, blatantly too!
I watched O'Loughlin on Friday it amazes me, has he ever made a tackle below shoulder height? god help Jaimie if ever commits a tackle like O'Loughlin did last year and, he only received one match ban!
Why was McShane not sin binned for Cas? (later 1 match ban) and why was Gelling not binned on Friday? you know as well as I do Jaimie would have walked for both of those incidents! If there was no review panel Jaimie would never be cited!
Hounding him out of the club is scandalous, I'd like to sit in with this review panel when they view the games, I'm sure it would be very interesting!
If Jaimie did leave the club there would be plenty takers!!

Do you usually embarrass yourself like this.

Kirk, absolutely spot on.

Jamie Acton = Timmy Street 2.0. I think the best approach is to nurture him, let time do the maturing and accept that he may miss a few games per season. In attack this guy will run through a brick wall and he's got great leg drive to pick up those extra yards which many forwards don't have. And in defence he looks to hurt the opposition - in an accepted rugby league way, which can only benefit Leigh's points for.

ACTON
It's not about potential, the player is important now
With his level of aggression, experience and scrutiny
He is of great value now.
It is clear that he divides opinion, mine is that players like him are vital in the development of our club
Others or other have a different opinion which is fine BUT you don't get many with the go forward aggression and size of Jamie
Opinions make the game
#futureinternational

£300 fine. No ban

Good....

That is almost like saying that he shouldn't have been reported.

Agree, tbh aside from the odd mistimed tackle and the Wiganer kicking a ball back on the pitch (easiest sinbiining ever- admittedly Hicks didn't do that!)wasn't anything worthy of a disciplinary from Fri's game.

The RFL needed enough money to cover Nigel Woods biscuit bill for the week

That comment is outrageous, unfounded and borderline libellous.

No way would 300 quid cover Nigel's weekly biscuit intake

it's actually 300lb of biscuits a week

I suggest you watch it a bit closer without your Leigh goggles on Cokey luv.

Quote ="atomic"I dont think thats the incident he's been cited for. The Clubb incident is more relevant. Acton doesn't really do much wrong hence the Grade A. Clubb sees him coming round and sticks his arm on Actons shoulder,Acton then removes Clubbs arm using both hands in a dangerous way < thats what I think the review panel have pinged him for. Hicks didn't react,no complaints from Clubb.Actons mistake was reacting to niggle in the same tackle,had he not swung a couple the review panel would have probably skipped it.'" It would appear that it was for the tackle on Burgess. www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/disciplinary Fairly innocuous to me, especially on a treacherous pitch.

Quote ="atomic"I dont think thats the incident he's been cited for. The Clubb incident is more relevant. Acton doesn't really do much wrong hence the Grade A. Clubb sees him coming round and sticks his arm on Actons shoulder,Acton then removes Clubbs arm using both hands in a dangerous way < thats what I think the review panel have pinged him for. Hicks didn't react,no complaints from Clubb.Actons mistake was reacting to niggle in the same tackle,had he not swung a couple the review panel would have probably skipped it.'" It would appear that it was for the tackle on Burgess. www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/disciplinary Fairly innocuous to me, especially on a treacherous pitch.

Quote ="MarioRugby"This time its a grade A charge. How much longer will the club tolerate this lads behaviour? He's a liability. www.totalrl.com/one-player-charged-rfl/'" Such a lazy headline. Have you been watching Leigh's matches this season? Jamie Acton has been the stand out forward this season and apart from the stupid sin bin against Leeds has kept his discipline. This is mainly due to there being no roughhouse tactics that prevailed last season by the Yorkshire mafia and improved refereeing this season. Oh and sorry to disappoint you but he is available for Friday - result!!!

Quote ="MarioRugby"This time its a grade A charge. How much longer will the club tolerate this lads behaviour? He's a liability. www.totalrl.com/one-player-charged-rfl/'" Such a lazy headline. Have you been watching Leigh's matches this season? Jamie Acton has been the stand out forward this season and apart from the stupid sin bin against Leeds has kept his discipline. This is mainly due to there being no roughhouse tactics that prevailed last season by the Yorkshire mafia and improved refereeing this season. Oh and sorry to disappoint you but he is available for Friday - result!!!

Mr dancing boy,now that you are challenging me to watch it again,I have,now can you elaborate what Mickey has done wrong? apart from like iv'e already said ,he pushes Clubb back onto the floor because he KICKS Mickey in the chest whilst he is trying to get up. BTW - It's 33 minutes on the LCTV clock.

My Hokey Cokey luv you can clearly see Mickey forcing Tony Clubs leg round that is why he gets the hump. He should have been penalised for retaliating but Mickey was no angel in the matter and season before last the RFL had a clamp down on players ping this type of thing.

Are you for real? There is nothing sinister in that tackle from Mickey. Yes he had hold of his legs, holding him down trying to buy some time,but not in a dangerous way. Now go and put your pies glasses back on.

Why wasn't he charged by the RFL then ?

50/50 call, his went one way, Actons the other - possibly reputation played a factor

I think Jamie may be misunderstood. He's a great player with unbelievable passion, fight, energy and is inexperienced. Makes more sense to get behind him and accept his misgivings rather than the constant negative posts about his behaviour.

Was hard last season to get behind a player who sat in the stands for nearly half the season. Thats what fans are concerned about

More fallout for Jamie from tonight's game I suppose...

Acton has been immense beyond my expectations this season, more than hold his own at this level BUT another ban coming his way I feel, and because of his reputation could well become a liability if he is not careful. No doubt he will be defended - helping out a man in trouble and all that - but it's all becoming a bit of a recurrence this