Conceding 5 tries in the last 15 to throw it away. 32-32 not good enough with such a big lead.

Won't mean too much as the season progresses, but disappointing right now.

players thought it was won Higson nightmare game

Couldn't go, however to concede 5 tries in just 15 minutes is not only shocking but very concerning. Injury hit, only one recognised half back maybe, but seriously, how do you concede 5 tries in 15 minutes?

Bossed the game for 65 minutes and then went into our shells. Very disappointed. However, with the players we have missing maybe it was a good result.

I think before the game started we would have been happy with a point

Considering hardly anybody on here gave us a cat in hells chance of winning this, I'm seeing this as a point gained. Yes, we should not have let that lead slip with 15 minutes to go but, with the amount of players missing from the starting line up. I'm happy. Let's see what happens in the next game.

If they were good enough to get that lead they should have kept it!

Bulls not at full strength either, good to know that we can play poorly for 65 minutes and still get a point.

Luckily for us we weren't playing a decent side otherwise we would have got a complete spanking!

32-6 up and you are asking if it was a point lost??

When I played my bit of RL in 1950s , we got winning money for an away draw!

Bradford were lucky to get a point out of today's game. We were clueless and disorganised for the majority of the game.

It was only because Leigh put the cue on the rack with 15 minutes to go that we were able to pick their pocket and steal a point.

Flank again.

Who's asking?

The whole thread is called 'point lost'.

Are you reading it?

The Leigh fan that started this thread

Clown

I don't think 'point lost' quite covers it.

Well it's not actually a question because they haven't used a question mark.

It was a point thrown overarm into the long grass.

That first 60 was the best I've seen the Leigh team for a few years, worryingly for me when higham leaves the pitch we go so one dimensional and lose all speed and shape! Not fosters fault as he's a good little player but we need Beswick back as we look so disorganised, thought Patterson was very good today but higham was on a complete different level to anyone on the pitch

Spot in Oggy, Paterson was quality and Higham ran the show for you guys

I unfortunately left after 65 minutes when we were losing 32-10 in disgust. I asked my wife to come and get me earlier to avoid the rush at the end, what a idiot

Think you are better without Chase, as Cas are and as Salford are

It's a tricky one! Paterson was good at 6 today but see him as a a 13! Riddy back at 6 and Ryan at 7. If the stories are true it's tough for rangi to get back! You missed a good finish your backlime is quick but that's our one weakness higson positional play today was shocking! We missed Kay

What's the story re Chase?

Not a clue! And that's how it should stay he didn't play for a reason that's between him and the coach and should stay as such, but you will have the fans in the know on soon spouting all sorts of rubbish

It must be pretty serious not to play your so-called star player against your biggest rivals.

A quote from Neil Jukes was that he had flu. However I am sure there will be a number of stories/rumours appearing over the next few hours from opposition teams fans who are 'in the know'.

He has flu according to Jukesies interview after the game. He's hoping he's back next week.