JAMIE ACTON - LEIGH
LEIGH V FEATHERSTONE - CHAMPIONSHIP
RANGE OF RECOMMENDED SANCTIONS IN RELATION TO CHARGED GRADE* :
1 Match Penalty Notice

DETAILS OF CHARGE / REASON FOR NF :
Rule - 15.1(c) Details - Drops knees first on an opponent on the ground (Careless) Grade - A

DECISION:
Charge

INCIDENT:
Drops knees first on an opponent on the ground in the 76th minute (Hardman)

Is this true??

No, I just thought i'd make it up for fun.

Must say youve gone to a lot of trouble to make something up.... twerb




Forgive my lack of understanding but does it mean he’s banned or just a warning?

Find out yourself....twerb

Thansk for your help, you have yourself a great Saturday night

Quote ="Bigtimeleigh"Thansk for your help, you have yourself a great Saturday night '" Thank you. Here you go..... www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/dis ... sciplinary

Quote ="Bigtimeleigh"Thansk for your help, you have yourself a great Saturday night '" Thank you. Here you go..... www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/dis ... sciplinary

Likelihood is he will get a 1 game ban due to his past record- good news is that is likely to be the Batley game as he will only be up before the panel next Tuesday

I can't dispute the decision, as I don't remember the incident - and the review panel have obviously looked at it closely. Somewhat bemused again, to learn that was the only 'iffy' tackle, completed by the 34 players in that match, though.

Here's a video explaining the guidelines. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... WZAhxxcllc

Here's a video explaining the guidelines. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... WZAhxxcllc

Nowt appeared worthy of a referral throughout the game.
Im a bit bemused myself....

No live tv coverage so how does it work?

Home club submits a dvd of the game.

.........Then the MRP scrutinise Mr Acton, then Booooom, we've gotcha.

Once you've got the reputation you put yourself in the spotlight unfortunately

Have to say though, in general he seems to be trying to control himself a little more this season, although you may also question whether that affects the aggression in his performance

Obviously they have spotted something he has done. Yet, the other 33 angels............? Not one other 'careless' challenge?

He is the most over rated prop forward to ever wear a Leigh shirt is Mr Acton. I just do not get it.

I will be surprised if he is not up again for a an absolutely blatant and unnecessary flop today.

Its the ladies who rate him lol

Got put on report again at fax so could have another ban coming up too

The blokes a thug although to be fair to him I had him down as Fax's 3rd best player today. Lol!

You haven't got clue which surprises me, if you are a Fax follower you would certainly know a thug or two when you see one!
Feel free to voice your opinion of him however, his Leigh critics (and there some) would not describe him has a Thug!

JAMIE ACTON - LEIGH
SHEFFIELD V LEIGH - CHAMPIONSHIP
DETAILS OF CHARGE / REASON FOR NF :
Player approaches from the side and makes contact with opponent on the thigh. Does not use unreasonable force to drive through the tackle forcing the joint against the natural range of movement. Sin Bin Sufficient.

DECISION:
No charge

INCIDENT:
Dangerous Contact in the 66th minute (Moran)

Fair enough. It didn't look great from a distance, but common sense has prevailed. Can't say I'm a great fan of that type of tackle though.

With the arrival of Ryan Bailey, the refs are going to have their work cut out to decide on who the 'villain' is!!

Looks like Jamie shouldn't have even been Sin-Binned, if he didn't use excessive force to make the Tackle?

It's still dangerous contact which in the eyes of the touch judge or ref warranted a sin bin. Hence sin bin sufficient.

Now if the ref had put it on report, that could of been a fine/suspension. But they have taken into account he was sin binned.

Either way it's still dangerous contact.