mandatory two years ban he's got, weren't Wigan going to stand by him, and give him a job in the community dept?

No Timms and Parker

IMHO that is just condoning what hes done, snort cocaine and we will give you a job and still pay you, disgusting if you ask me !!!!

apparently he is such an expert with the white stuff that he is being employed part-time to paint the lines on the pitch..

Robbie Fowler style

Dont shoot the messenger here, but take away him being a sportsman.....he's an employee of a company and in todays climate of employment law, its actually hard to dismiss someone for gross misconduct for snorting a bit of coke.

It may not be the reason, but I'll lay money on some of Wigans Human Resources people having kittens over just simply tearing his contract up.

But surley as a proffesional sportsman his contract would state somewhere he should not take drugs!!

Or it should do so that they can just tear his contract up if they are caught!!

You'd think so but I gaurantee there will be some bedwetting liberal who says 'hang on, as an employer we have a legal duty to help this poor fellow and ensure the correct proceedures are followed'.

It sends across the wrong messages to the youngsters that look up to these professional sportsmen, it say its ok to misuse drugs because you will still get paid and keep your job. What a load of ********

At the end of the day if you take drugs outside of work and it affects your performance on the job in someway then I'm sure you'd be history.

That's what Hock has done and I don't think any court in the land would support his case if he went to court should Wigan want to tear up his contract.

what job could that moron actually do in the real world? hes just a thick scrubber

Anti-swearing steward at Gatehead???

So, a two year ban, eh?

Well - that's not to be sniffed at!!

I bet he feels a proper "Charlie"!

He should have snow ed better

Where's your proof?

I believe a statement from Wigan will be made in the next two weeks.

I wonder if he's got another job[i lined up[/i?

It was Question numbnuts the

is a clue

But it provoked this response.


i have not seen anything from Wigan to say that Hock will be employed by the club.

Have you?

The way you asked the question was more of a statement, and that is I presume why you got that reply highlighted above.

If I recall correctly, When the news first came out, before he actually got his ban, it was on WishFM radio that they were giving him a job in development

Ian Lenagan has stated many times that Wigan will NOT comment until after the case has "run it's course" and as such I would expect a directive from the club in the next few weeks.

It's my understanding that Hock cannot be paid by the club in any form.

Let's wait and see.

any new job's not to be sniffed at!

Like I said the [size=200?[/size was a clue dont judge my standards by your very poor own

One or the other - it can't be both!! That question mark was the real give away though!!

How dare anyone post anything satirical about Wigan on an internet forum!