One question finishes the debate about try/no try......if roles where reversed and the Aussies where down by 4 and waiting for video ref verdict,,,, would it be given???? I think we all know the answer!

Well let me say this, in the World Cup the England team played the best that I have seen them for quite a while. He was the coach then was he not? Not my favourite but not as bad as some make out.

Last night I rewatched the Tonga, Cook Island match from exactly 1 year ago, to help remove the stench of corruption towards International RL I smelt after Sundays game

Bloody good game that

It was never a try by Hall int memory of mon, Ask yourselves if the ref had awarded Ingliss a winning try in similar circumstances. Robbed would have been the outcry.

If you have ever played Rugby League as I did way back in the day, you always know when you have scored a try, especially a last minute test match winning try. You certainly dont run back and line up ready for a drop out that's for sure.

By the same yard stick then theirs wasn't either earlier in the game !

These decisions are like the forward pass rule, they are too ambiguous. We ahould get back to the ball being passed backwards and you having to have control and downward pressure for a try. A finger on the ball is no good.