Quote ="Chancellor Palpatine"Either would be a great choice.
However does it really matter. [size=150If the Chelsea fc chairman (Bruce buck) left I'm sure not many fans would be that concerned. If the owner left (Abramovich) most would be extremely worried.[/size
John did a great job in steering the new board, but for whatever reason he's left. Well done john for a job well done & what a great bloke he is.
For me the more worrying thing is the comments on this unofficial chat room by directors of the club, firstly Neil Wilcox praised three directors for their good work( but excluded Andy mazey ) Andy responded that he wasn't pleased with this comment.
Some fans have suggested Andy as chairman but he 's responded that it may not be possible. What's happening?
We beLeighve.'"
And here in lies the main concern for me and I'm sure all true fans of this club!
A Chairman standing down is not a major problem in isolation but after what happened when Arthur Thomas sadly had to stand down it was unanimously agreed that this club should never ever be allowed to fall under the control of one individual ever again. If the rumours round town are true John won't be the last of the new guys to leave and according to someone who works at the club I know Rob Parker has not been seen or heard from since John walked. It's sad but seems like despite a fantastic 12 months orchestrated by John and Andy and the guys turning this clubs fortunes round old names and faces are seemingly coming to fore and I hope I'm wrong but we are now back to having a major shareholder and effectively and owner meaning one man has ultimately control if true and this is not what the club, town and community needs long term or I don't believe wants.
Allan Rowley Arthur's main man when he owned the club and a current employee of one of the Directors rumoured to be the owner was referred to as a club Director is this true? This new era was sold on transparency and honesty time to practice what has been preached guys!!!!!