Alan wrote:Oddly enough, something similar happened in our previous game against Featherstone. Andy Kain was waiting to come on, while Nanyn was kicking at goal. I guess Kain was standing about a foot inside the touchline. Suddenly Robert Hicks yellow carded him and allowed Fev to retain 13 men. It wasn't clear why Hicks crded him, but if itwas for encroaching, it was petty. However, Fev had a sub yellow carded, but were allowed to retain a full team. Granted the sub hadn't actually created a try, but still similar circumstances.


If he was on the field then they had 14 men on, perhaps we should appeal and ask for a re-match?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Maybe it just felt like you were playing 14 but it was evened up by the ref

lol

So they have deemed sending off sufficient for Duffy for entering the field a couple of seconds before McConnell left the field. As someone else mentioned lets watch the CC and SL games and see if anything similar happens.

Thought it was 'no charge' Derek? There's a difference - SOS implies he was guilty of something, but punished sufficiently. To me, no charge means he didn't do anything wrong.

Took the phrase SOS from the Sporting Life report that has appeared this morning, the Disciplinary Report on the RFL just says NFA

No Charge on RFL website means no case to answer one would think.

All sorted if you go off this. www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1949 Nice try Haven

All sorted if you go off this. www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1949 Nice try Haven