Quote ="itsatry!"Would like to know their reasoning behind that Alan,only one i can think of is to hinder the championship clubs
i mean you would think that the champ clubs could afford 2 overseas more than champ 1 ,its very odd to say the least.'"
Reasoning? RFL? I haven't a clue, but perhaps it goes something like this:-
Championship clubs (
or Championship 1, as per the RFL) - To protect them from over-spending.
Championship 1 (or Championship 2, as per the RFL) - To allow them more scope to attract players, as there aren't enough British ones to go round. Hopefully, they'll be able to attract 'cheap' imports - who, of course, won't qualify for a visa, thereby saving the Championship 1 clubs (or Championship 2, according to the RFL) from over-spending.
Then, of course, there are the Championship and Championship 1 clubs (or Championship 1 and 2, according to the RFL) who can have limitless overseas' players, because they have pots of money, no access to 'local' talent, and don't seem to need the same visas as anyone else.
Apologies for the jaundiced view, and I hope that clarifies things for you?