Higham and Clarke comparisons are a bit chalk and cheese.

You need eyes not stats to know that the reason we have lost matches this season has been due to missed tackles, errors and conceding penalties.

That's rubbish.

Most supporters were happy apart from the few who liked him ''coz e putz in loads of effut''.

Most of his performances in a Wigan shirt were poor/average. You only have to look at the 2007 season when Shane Millard outplayed him most of the year.

simple
Clarke is better in defence
Higham is better in attack
Pity we don't play american football

problem with clarke is when we need him to come up with a big play he never does

i think he comes up with a lot of good balls out of acting half that give our halves the time and space they need to set the moves up which result in the tries that we score out wide

bit of an unsung hero in my book on that score, the moves are finished out wide but they always start with a good pass out of dummy half and it always seems to me that when we score these tries it's clarke in at 9

good point have to agree there tino

I've said for a while that Clarke gets alot of unfair stick.

He is useful to have in the team, think he would have made a decent loose forward as when he runs at broken play he can draw defenders and give a nice pass, such as the one to Vinny on Sat.

here here . cant understand why he gets slated all the time.

I think Clarkes improved an awful lot over the past 3 or 4 years.
I never rated him at all, the amount of time it took him to distribute a ball had me spitting feathers but I definately feel he's a worthy player now.
I would have to agree that overall he's the better player

Good debate this, I think both players suit it each other very well. Clarkey the distributes the ball very cleverly, defends well and communicates with the forwards very well. While Higham, provides that good impact off the bench, makes great runs from dummy half and can exploit the holes in defence very well.

Probably one of the best Hooker combos in the league. I'd prefer not to compare them as both of them bring different qualities to the hooking position and to the side.

I don't think either of them are that great. It is also now probably the most important position in the game.

Completely agree. Look at the best teams in the league. Saints have Cunningham and Roby, and Leeds boast Buderus and Diskin. Our hookers don't compare, and like you say its becoming the most important positon in RL.

what a pile of you talk diskin hahahahahahahah go away you pest

wrong

well your watchin the wrong game then

are you on drugs you muppett

God almighty. Another genius.

Can you not just say I dont agree with you.?????????????????????

well your not are you with that rubbish

i can but didnt want

Get off the computer NOW,

your babysitter as arrived....

Sometimes. But WTF has this got to do with anything? Our Hookers don't compare to Leeds and St Helens', you muppet

I'm sorry but, eight pages in, how is this thread title cool. I mean, why on earth are we derogatory to our own players, I just think it's pretty poor in truth. All this forum is becoming is a place to run down our players time & time again.

'One Trick Mick', for goodness sake. He's a bloke, doing his best for our club, who's shown pride in the shirt every time he's worn it, gives it all, like countless other players do.

It's just pathetic, supporters we claim to be. We offer no 'suppport' whatsoever.