Who’s left? Those without Powell’s endorsement (signed or resigned) today were Widdop, Mulhearn, Clark, Cooper, Currie & Davis.

Clark was our best today, Cooper is gone but is still being picked, probably still out best prop. Widdop was lively again, not sure he could have prevented any of the points we shipped in. Still, he was rushed back at the expense of Dean. Mulhearn, Davis & Currie, not great but absolutely will not pick Longstaff no matter how well he plays in the reserves, J Clark is the forgotten man, remember Powell resigned him so he could displace and of those bad apples.

This excuse has ran it’s course. He’s had free reign to ship out players all year regardless of stature, and been backed to bring in his own men, 10 in total, 11 if you count Billy 6 weeks.

Could it be, that those “bad apples” are simply annoyed at seeing the club they’ve worked so hard for over the years being stripped down like a retired cruise liner and sold off for scrap on the whim of an under qualified and underachieving coach.

How was Wardle?

Obviously didn't have much to work with but made a nice break which resulted in a try in the second half. Probably too early to judge but I would say no worse than King which is of course damning with faint praise.

Missed a tackle very early on allowing them to make a break, and was stood on his heels when someone walked past him for their 2nd(I think) try.

Well a CEO signs the players and appoints the coaches.

Price and Powell (currently) have been disastrous appointments.

There were 2 seemingly carbon copy tries yesterday from.Salford, under our sticks, 1 out crash balls, and not even at the line crash balls, just walk through a gap kind of tries. We're not scoring those type of tries, under 8's rarely concede those types of tries yet we're making a habit of it.

This wasn't always off the back of broken play, these were drives that every team takes.

Powell may have a vision and a process he wants to build, but if his support staff aren't good enough he'll become a victim of any nepotism he may have taken part in. It's easier to tell people you hardly have a relationship with that they're expendable, different when it's the one's you've brought with you

From a neutral looking in (well as neutral as a wigan fan can be...... but i still want to see a strong Wire in SL) I'm stunned at how Powell has gone about his first year.

Surely the job of a head coach is to get the best of his players even if he hasn't signed them while transitioning and improving. No coach gets to pick his team from a clean sheet, and Warrington weren't that far off...........

Everyone could see you were far too light up front this year - and Powell signed a number of players but did nothing to fix the most glaring issue,

He's not just cracked a few eggs to make an omelette he's killed all the chickens in the coup.

It makes Millwards tenure as a Wigan coach look almost passable - and he inherited a far worse performing squad than Powell did.

I find it amazing so many are still supporting him.

I must say ,for a bad apple ,Cooper gives 100% every week.

So what excuse have the players got for the past 7 odd years including getting knocked out, in the first round, at home in the past 3 years? So after 7 odd years of underperforming, they've suddenly grown a conscience and are now annoyed at the club's predicament?

These same 'annoyed' players are the ones who threw Steve Price under the bus and Tony Smith in his last 2 years.

Although I'm still strongly behind Powell, I do agree with comments that he has perhaps gone in too much like a bull in a China shop.

That said, yesterday's capitulation was down to the players and the players only. They had it in their power to win that game and they chose not to, in front of their home fans who supported them throughout in the most part. Rather than play for the supporters and close out the win, they put themselves first and thought 'why should I put the effort in when I've now been told I can't finish training early'.

Many a rugby league player and pundit will say that defence is more about attitude than anything else, and that's why our defence is poor and why we lost.

The 4 years of Price were awful, it’s widely accepted. But he made the play offs year on year, the team made it to finals and even looked like they might even do something. That complete abject failure of a 4 year tenure is so far away from where we are now. Price came in and started by “fixing up the defence”, we never conceded 40 or more and were difficult to break down, that is a positive of his reign. But he couldn’t make the attack work. Right now, we can’t do anything.

Smith’s last years included Cooper, Currie, Ratchford and Clark. So if you’re suggesting that these are the bad apples that run through the club, then why have they been consistently picked by Smith, Price and Powell? We have Walker desperate for game time, if Clark is a bad apple, let Walker play. Ratchford has been resigned as he is a good influence, as Powell suggests, Currie is consistently picked over Longstaff, if he’s so disruptive then get rid. So that leaves Cooper. Cooper is the bap apple. But still picked over and again.

I can’t fathom this pig-headed approach to Powell. What has he done to earn the right to burn the club to the ground and put it back together? He’s alienated himself from the fans, it appears that he has done that with the players, why does he deserve unwavering support when he can’t get the basics right, can’t drop the ‘bad apples’ or can’t allow the promising juniors to play without hanging them out to dry in press conferences 6 weeks after their last game?

I agree with your take here.

I'm not sure if the problem is that he has gone in like a bull in a China shop but the guys he's brought in haven't worked. Mikel Arteta has taken a similar approach at Arsenal and results have been mixed, but Arteta has got credit in the bank because some of the young players have advanced under him and he's made some signings that have clearly improved the team.

Powell has brought in some guys who aren't doing it and look worse than the guys from the Price era who he is moving on. This will really be killing Powell's reputation in the squad, because the ones who are on the outer and not buying in to Powell's methods will be saying to each other "he wants us out and he's replacing us with these turds".

Still, there's a reason I was keen on Powell being Wire coach since the end of the TS era. He is a good coach who has improved teams in different environments and played a positive style of rugby. So I'm willing to ride through blips and go all in on Powell, give him a good 3 years.

Making the playoffs year on year and getting knocked out at home on each occasion against teams with considerably smaller budgets. Is that acceptable with the investment our club have made?

Surely you must see that in order to undertake a root and branch change of culture, to hopefully achieve the GF, it means they'll have to be fundamental changes to playing staff. Any coach brought in, who's tasked with making these fundamental changes will have faced the same problem I imagine. If a new manager came in at your place of work and told you and the rest of your colleagues that you've been underperforming for years, you need to buck your ideas up, and there are no more perks like finishing early; would you and the rest of your team be working at 100%? I imagine no. And in addition, you'd be overtly putting in less effort than for the previous coach who used to give you an easier ride - therefore a drop in performance below the previous regime's level. Difference is with this lot, there are thousands of supporters there cheering them on, and they still can't be bothered to put the effort in.

They weren't bad apples necessarily under the other 2 coaches because they were performing to the levels expected by those coaches at the time. And those levels were getting knocked out in the first round of play offs at home against 'inferior' sides. Powell isn't accepting those levels. He sees, I'm certain, that those players should be performing at higher levels and potentially levels that can take the club the club one step further and he's forcing the issue and it's backfiring. At least he's trying though and sees what many of us have thought - that these players, for a number of years have been coasting it.

I do agree with you and others though that there should be more consistently and reason for players to be dropped and promoted to the first team. I'd get rid of the lot and put in the young players/players putting effort in for the rest of the season.

I'm ambivalent about this, but I'm just about still in the Powell camp.

But he hasn't just come in a few weeks back, we are now several months into the project and it increasingly feels like a desperate, scattergun approach that is yielding no results.

No new manager bounce
No improvement in playing style

I agree, root and branch change takes time, is painful and is often unpalatable. But he would get much more buy in if everyone could see some green shoots, even short term, quick win green shoots.

All I see is division, dischord and alienation.

Unfortunately though it seems player power is still king and until there all gone, Powell is stuck with players who who would rather show their disdain for the changes through lazy performances than play for pride and their club's fans.

There are too many bad apples for this season to turn around performance-wise.

But I have faith in Powell, his track record of improving players and clubs over a long, long period of time is worth the trust imo.

Cooper was told by Powell he wasn't wanted for 2023, as soon as Powell came to the club this year. He doesn't want to leave and hadn't had any cross words with Powell at the time either.

What is this bad apple cobblers??? The worst playing apple is Oliver Holmes yet seems undroppable. As nice a guy as Mr Ratchford is he’s a woeful six. Thewlis could’ve been FB all season but no he’d rather play a player there who is leaving next season who could be helping out in the halves.

No bad apples caused Powell to bring a very unfit Mikaele back on with 10 to go with a flimsy lead at stake, no bad apples caused him to play Greg ruddy Minikin on the wing. The excuses are wearing thin. The emperor was down to his long johns for me last week but he’s completely in the knack now and it’s not a pretty sight.

It’s absolute nonsense that a “root and branch” transition is a legitimate excuse for what is being served up now. It’s JULY. He took charge in March/April last year and had autonomy over signings. He has signed 11 players and retained (on new contracts) 5. This is HIS squad. The bad apple tune is played out, he’s been backed to dispose of Charnley, Magoulias and King. Displaced Butler and Doro and filled the squad to suit what he wants. He’s signing garbage, mates, has-beens.

But, with 16 in a squad directly recruited/retained by him, he can’t get a tune out of them. They can’t defend, they fall away at the back end of games and there is no marked improvement on the woeful attack.

What has he achieved? Where are the green shoots of hope for me to renew my season ticket? More importantly, when appointed, what did the board hand down as an acceptable performance indicator and has he met that? We’re 10th, and either Wakefield will draw level with us or Toulouse will close the gap to 4 points from the bottom.

You say about limping out of the play offs with a whimper, at the moment there should be genuine concern about going down. The job was getting a squad on-side and united to challenge for a title, and we’re six points off the club he left and stripped of his preferred players. We’re in freefall.

It pains me to say that is the post of the week.

We’re stayin up brother!

Seconded. If it comes to a three-way shootout between us, Trinity and Toulouse then we are in trouble - they will beat us based on desire, pride and effort alone.

It's a good post and really good points made, especially about the players he's brought in. But if half the team know they're going, and are hacked off about it, I'm not expecting much else until next season.

We need to give Powell at least this and next season and we defo need to see shoots of recovery next season. If it's like this midway through next season, then alarm bells will be ringing.

Out of interest, what would be your choice of action?

The problem is I don’t see us winning a game currently. We’ve won 2 in 13 and one of those was the game against Hull which was hardly a classic.

We’re in a relegation fight - and still have to play Toulouse again.

I’d still like to stick with Powell but if relegation becomes a real threat with no sign of improvement then we may need to make a hard decision. I did think we need one more win to be safe but think at least two necessary now.

I'm not having that the majority of the team are bad apples and not wanting to play. If a player knows they may not be / will be ejected at the end of the season I would be trying to impress to secure a contract elsewhere.
How do all those who are bad mouthing these so called bad apples know?
There is one bad apple, and that is the guy who has the responsibility to work with each and every player, develop the strengths, improve on their weaknesses and to coach them as a team in a game plan that works for them to win games. Team work and team spirit. None of this exists. Wasn't this supposed to be Powell's strength? If so it has deserted him and the club are paying for it - with speccies money.
I have watched Wire for many many years, this is one of the worst I have seen, and takes some doing!
Powell is a failed experiment, I almost feel sorry for him, I am sure he really wants success but its not happening is it?

I’ve said the same thing a lot over the last 6 years, but much more since around March last year, the board haven’t got the recruiting correct. The club doesn’t have a style, or a philosophy. Saints have played the same style for years, Wigan since McGuire have hammered home their style, Melbourne Storm the same. Yet we go from being free flowing rugby with Smith, then toward the back end try to rip off the Saints method of hard running and scooting, then Price comes in with percentage play and now Powell, who if anything is an attacking coach.

This comes from the top down, and help junior development when it comes to people stepping in to the system seamlessly as they’ve played the same brand through scholarship, academy, reserves.

It’s a big beast to coach the first team, and lead on the development of reserves/academy/womens/PDRL etc all at once, so I think a Director of Rugby is essential until we have those tram tracks in place. The board need to decide what this club should look like, what style we are to play and what is acceptable (behaviourally & delivery) from players and coaches, then a DoR needs to be recruited to suit that mould.

For me, Warrington need to play attractive rugby, we don’t have the pool of fans and amateur teams around to sustain viewers and participants like Leeds/Wigan/Saints have, so we need to entertain and drag people through the turnstile. From that, I’d bring in Tony Smith as DoR and bring in an attack-minded coach to work with him. Might have been too soon for Briers to come back, but someone with an affinity with the club who the fans will get behind and stick with if the start was tough. Matt King is highly thought off, in a good system at the Roosters too. Michael Monaghan maybe, but I think he’s stepped back from coaching first grade and is now in pathways at Manly.

I’ve said all along, it’s not necessarily Powell’s fault, but it’s a square peg. There needs to be a stronger link with the fans to reconnect. After some slow years with Price, and Covid, we need to build that rapport. At the minute, with every press conference, Powell puts more land between the fans and the club.