Quote ="NtW"I could counter all your illogical ramblings'"
Quote ="NtW"I'm not accusing you of 'ramblings''"
Oh dear!
Quote ="NtW"The RFL's dealings with the Bulls were ratified by the relevant parties and the clubs had knowledge of this, so in what way were they 'secret'?'"
[urlhttp://dictionary.reference.com/browse/secret?s=t[/url
Secret. See above. Neither the general public nor the media knew.
Quote ="NtW"And how is a club being barred from entry to SL through the franchise process a 'precedent' for a club that goes insolvent in SL (I.e. in completely different circumstances, more akin to say Wakefield, Crusaders or London, all of whom were allowed to continue)?'"
When did London go into administration?
Widnes were told that the administration under previous ownership barred them from membership of SL.
Wakey went into admin and then the next season were given a franchise. Not the best evidence to show there is no W Yorks bias.... but thanks!
Crusaders is an interesting one because the next season they applied for a franchise but then withdrew so we will never know if the RFL would have allowed them to stay in, though they bent over backwards to help them as an expansion club, which I have less of a problem with than the different treatment of established NW and W Yorks clubs.