Your memories certainly better than mine


Thinking about it I can't hardly remember a thing about the 99 season other than I think Cas or Fax did well and London reached the cup final.
I mainly remember him in 00/01 outside Langer/Briers and in his early days, still remember his debut.
Anyway, I still reckon both at their peaks Gleeson was the better centre even if I cant remember 99

You ask why people would like back average scrum halves, yet you pick an average utility player.

Nat wood would be a good addition to our current team. However, Alfie langer would have to be the one player over the past 10 that you would want in our team

He was a god. Nat Wood isn't fit to lace Monaghan's boots and that is saying something!

Behave!!

How many times has Monoghan took the game by the scruff of the neck from scrum half? His best work has been at hooker.

Comparing the two as scrum halves from what we've witnessed in wire shirts Nat wood was the more effective.

Lefty, I do believe you are talking out your ass.

Are the sands of time playing tricks with your memory?

when Richie Myler Puts on a number 7 shirt next year it will be the first time Warrington Rugby League club have had a scrum half since Nat wood Left.

why People choose to rubbish a player that was an absolute 110 per and a big influence on the team is beyond me. if monaghan left the club today he'd be vaugely rememember for two halves of good rugby league.

anyway Langer all day long for me

No you can rubbish the guys natural borne talent all you want but the guy had a massive heart was always determined and ran his blood to water every time he played in a wire shirt? Can the latter be said about a sulky Monoghan who has only seemed interested since moving to hooker?

But if the 5 million post brigade say Nat wood was average he must be! Roll on the day when we get a team full of Darren burns’

No, but you could say it about Burns.

True i'll give you that. However, burns spent alot of his time at the club on the injury table and will for me never be held in the same esteem as Nat.

Your username and avatar pic in conjunction with your argument relating to "average players" has been duly noted.

How many times did Nat Wood? He was a rubbish scrum half that couldn't pass.

As with Monas he was a better hooker. Monas is also twice the hooker he could ever be.

I clearly stated scrum half because I agree Monoghan is the better hooker.

Do you not find it funny how 6 wire fans have chosen him as the 1 player they would have over the past 10 years? What would they know hey? Must have been rubbish…

Wow 6? 6???!?!? Well then I stand corrected. He was crap get over it.

where as *** **** spent most of his time dropping the ball.

Yeah because every wire fan was surveyed wasn’t they? You moron. If you’re honest with yourself will admit you are in the minority who thinks he’s rubbish. I have nothing to get over, I know he was a good player for wire and choose to disagree with your opinion. I’m not going to loose no sleep tonight.

Get you. Well done. 3 and a bit years at the club 1 good game. Average.

because he was`nt below average..if you really think that it proves you know sod all.....

Not to get into a bit of a petty arguement, but I know whose name was being chanted with vim and vigour week in, week out towards the back end of the 2002 season. And it wasn't Nathaniel Wood's.

Grahame hippo...

78 games in three season seems to rather all over your comments. As I said, your memory is shagged.

PS:

Moron.

dale cardoza

Mark Forster

Nat wood

drummond