Was the Peyreaux try legit a try....WHO KNOWS?

But, THERE WAS NO CONCLUSIVE PROOF. Yes, he got the ball over the line, but did he ground it. I don't know, and you lot don't know. So, the rule says we go with ref's decision.
Tonight, we gained from it.
Two weeks ago, with the fingerintouchgate, it didn't.

As Alex Murphy would say, fish and chips wrapping paper, tomorrow.

Well done, Wire. Superb.

Today is the 37th anniversary since I first walked through the gates of Wilderspool. I' m raising a glass of Islay to celebrate.

Name all the terrible decisions that were so out of the ordinary from a normal game... saints were offside throughout, didn't get penalised, boo hoo.

There was one controversial call, the lineham try, everything else was run of the mill.

Doesn't matter if the kicker catches it. He just got it wrong.

What? You don't even know the rules.

If a saints players is offside, they cannot attempt to catch the ball or run within ten metres of the warrington player attempting to.

When it bounced they were about 2 metres away, therefore technical offside, it doesn't matter if the ball then bounces backwards to walsh.

He gave the decision against the person who caught the ball.

Congratulations, post of the week.

when your team gets the decisions its all great, if I was a wires fan I wouldn't be to bothered, but the game is gonna suffer if the refs are not held accountable for games like this, that's all everybody is talking about, we need as a game to sort this out,

How about you didn't even get the ball down on your 1st try

No he didn't? He clearly shouts at the saints player do not go withing 10 you're offside, they ignore him, therefore he penalises them.

He didn't give it against the kicker.

You cannot just make things up and then get outraged over it.

Gidley got it down initially, any more?

To all the Stains fans...It's always our year, now go cry me a river.

Completely agree, clearly a lot of Warrington fans because they are so invested won't see it and I don't blame them, go and celebrate the win, but the outcome from this should be Thaler been dropped from the top level. He needs to be held accountable.

Thankfully we only have to suffer Stevo for 1 more game.

Even linehams was technically a try, grounded with torso.

He is so tedious, no analysis of the game, just random ramblings and cliches.

go enjoy a beer Ron... Great win for you guys tonight. Warrington deserve it.

Haha I'll have what your having pal

Phil Clarke was right imo.
Lineham and peroux tries both ok.
We'll take a bit of luck and were deservedly winners.

As Forest Gump said life is like a box of chocolates you never know what your gonna get.Well we got it tonight so who gives a flying f---.

Correct... about a yard short then held up over the line by Lomax

Go and buy a paper in the morning, let me know what the result is!!!

TBF, I don't think anybody is saying Warrington don't deserve their place. Your team can only play the whistle and won fair and square in that respect.

The problem is with the standard of the officiating. That I do give a f about, as it has wide implications for our game. It needs urgently improving.

Champagne probably

Your witty, I can tell.

We deserve nothing this season and Warrington are deserved finalists over the course of it. However, tonight was a very simple robbery. I think nearly all of us Saints fans have groaned about Cunningham bemoaning decisions when the lack of performance should be the priority, but for once the referee did define our defeat tonight. It wasn't a case of general bad decisions, it was all three trys in the second half that very clearly went the wrong way. Tbf, despite the two offenses in the run up, there was nothing wrong with Ratchford's finish and we have to look to ourselves for not being alert. You do make your own luck to a certain extent and we proved that in our golden years. We've got to rebuild and wing those decisions in the future.