Possibly. That will definitely be another reason for a negative effect. But a big counter against that is increased revenues through ticket sales for a start. Unfortunately I've not got the bean counter job so I can't tell you until the accounts are published.

Also remember this is fuelled by the rugby league press as its something to talk about, the whole "RL clubs are spending beyond their means and need to rein themselves in before disaster strikes" raises its head from time to time, gets a bit of debate, people who are disillusioned with Super League and the franchising system will say I told you so, the game will collapse in a few years if Leigh or Featherstone don't get promoted etc.

Wait till the end of the season when rugby union gets linked with one of our players and the debate will soon change, the salary cap should be raised so clubs can pay players the market rate otherwise RU will sign all our top players like Joel Tomkins and the game will die, RL is a tougher sport than football so why don't RL players get paid the same as footballers, etc. There won't be talk about clubs being in financial trouble then it will be about having to be able to spend more to compete with RU.

Keep dreaming, bro.

I also find it interesting that the 'Bulls' financial model was fine and dandy with Bulls fans while they were sweeping everyone aside and winning trophies. Now their management is claiming that it was not a viable model at all. Funny that it only occurs to them now they ain't picking up the cups anymore.

Agree with this,where as all the money gone from the glory years????.And if bradford survive they need new leadership,fair play to all them fans helping bail them out but i wouldnt want any of current board involved.

Quote ="karetaker"Agree with this,where as all the money gone from the glory years????.And if bradford survive they need new leadership,fair play to all them fans helping bail them out but i wouldnt want any of current board involved.'" The second instalment of a three-year compensation deal to Leeds over the Iestyn Harris saga contributed to the Bulls’ losses www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/s ... ulls_back/

Quote ="karetaker"Agree with this,where as all the money gone from the glory years????.And if bradford survive they need new leadership,fair play to all them fans helping bail them out but i wouldnt want any of current board involved.'" The second instalment of a three-year compensation deal to Leeds over the Iestyn Harris saga contributed to the Bulls’ losses www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/s ... ulls_back/

I could have sworn I'd read something in the Warrington Guardian where Gatcliffe stated that the club took out a loan for the work to fill in the corners?

I must have mis-read it. Interesting that the club had the capital available to pay for it outright, I wouldn't have expected it.

Found where I got the idea that the club financed the expansion with a loan from....

Just going back to the Bulls 'model', one of their fundamental problems was that they had to average attendances of over 10k (maybe as high as 11.5k) to break even because of the ongoing work to the stadium. That's OK when you're winning but - a little like Wigan planning their finances based on winning the CC every year in the 80-90's - you can't guarrenttee that.

Bulls are hampered by their ground but it looks like they didn't talk to their bankers before selling the ground to the RFL !!
If true - it's amateurish and Hood should hang his head in shame.

Do we know how much the extension cost?

The Guardian has quoted £2million in the past in relation to filling in the corners.

was told by someone who works for the company carrying out the work that it cost £1.5 million and was funded by two of the board members.

The extra in the saints game would have paid a little back. An extra 1700 speccies at say £20 each-approx an extra £34000.

2000 extra. Capacity has gone from 13024 to 15000.