They should charge him with being in possession of a Dangerous face.

Guys we are all forgetting that this is Wigan - he'll get off with a warning

Michael McGuire said he didn't see much in the Hock tackle on Harrison. The Crust munchers, said he hadn't had time to review it. Well he has now and we haven't heard from him. So I suppose he must still think the same.

Another thread about Wigan... it would be easier to merge the 2 boards!

The thread is about a current topic it only happened yesterday.

Well said that man.Just said the same thing on the bored thread.

I think Lima only getting a caution for hair pulling is shocking.

Harrison never even felt hes eye or even touched hes eye after the incident that's because no finger went in his : eye Harrison wasnt hurt ,, ,Definition of eye gauge! Loss,of vision, streaming eyes, unable to open ur eyes, non of which happened!!!

So by your definition, a head high tackle is fine so long as the 'victim' is able to get up and play on? A chicken wing is fine so long as the arm isn't broken or shoulder dislocated? A spear tackle is totally OK if the player is able to get up again?

So by that Harrison has to lose an eye for Hock to get suspended. Don't be so stupid. You cannot defend the indefensible. It was an awful thing to do and it was then compounded by the punch. Two charges, one long ban to follow. Mind you, when the ban's over he'll get another hero's welcome from the fans when he comes back.

If Hock pleads guilty he will only get a short ban. However, if he pleads not guilty he should get the maximum ban on both counts. Not in our sport thanks.

How ing stupid are you?

On second thoughts, seeing as you had a go at stringing a twelve (that number is as big as all your fingers and thumbs, then take your socks off and count your two big toes as well) word sentence together, I'm guessing you can't be Hock.

Now the dust has settled do people still think it was that bad?

Watch it again and see if you feel it deserves an 8 match ban.

I defo think it should be 1 for the punch and 2-4 for the attempt at gouging.

can i at this point just show you the thread from top of the page?

No contact with the eye? Has Hock been eye gouging you as well?

Tonight before your mummy tucks you in bed....try a little experiment.

close your eyes and poke your left eye with a stick

next...keep your eyes open and using that same stick, poke your eye

Now...which hurts the most?

evolution has provided us with an eyelid to protect people from gouging pie eaters.....and a lot of the time it works

(For any readers, do not try this at home)

So just to clear this up, in your opinion attempting to eye gouge a person warrants a 2 game ban ( even though its 4 minimum)... so in your opinion does a person have to remove a players eyeballs to get a 4 plus game ban?

It was wrong what Hock did was stupid, I don't know what he was doing but he does touch Harrisons eye but not to the point as shown in the link below, it was careless, it was stupid and it was wrong especially the uppercuts that followed but in the cold light of day it wasn't like in the link below like some people make it out to be.

[urlhttp://bop.nppa.org/2006/still_photography/winners/SAT/42440.html[/url

He was shoving his fingers into Harrisons eyes, have you ever done this to a person accidentally... any attempt to do this imo should be an 8 game ban at least.

Does a player have to be blinded before it is taken seriously.

Oh and it was very similar to that link.

I think your being a little harsh Ron. I think because we haven't had anyone done for gouging for as long as I can remember, the Hock incident is getting blown out of proportion.

If you watch the repeat of the incident 'on mute' without the muppets on sky giving you their opinion it aint that bad, the nearest he gets is the tip of his index finger touches his eyelid when his eyes are shut, which wouldn't cause much pain, prob wouldn't feel a thing with the adrenaline pumping, I've had a stray finger/thumb in the eye many a time playing rugby and a few times sparring which wasn't painful just makes the eyes water, the link I gave previously 'is' most definatley eye gouging, the Hock incident was nowhere near as bad.

No it's gauging that ain't being blown out of proportion at all you prick. Gauging is gauging, it's the worst house tactic that a rugby player can perform, part from bum an official on the pitch.

there's a reason it carries an 8 game ban is because anyone who plays or has played this game knows there is a tough honesty that goes with rugby league. Be the big man, yes pleaase, be the little house half back that jincks his way over, we'll clap that all day.

Get hurt honestly banging yourself against a big pack, we'll clap you off he pitch.

Be a house that picks another player up by the eyes like a bowling ball then you have no place in this sport.

You sir have never put a kit on, and have no idea of the unwritten rules of gobery that Hock (Charnock- let's not open that can) has done.

Look sunshine. If I came round to yours tonight and shat on your living room carpet , would you say that what I did what inexcusable. If I said it was accidental would that be any less excusable ... no

Now off !

I cannot believe anyone is even trying to defend or belittle what the psycho, drug using, cheap shot merchant did.

Some Wigan fans are making themselves look very shabby over this...VERY SHABBY.

But it is irrelevent whether he hurt Harrison or not ( I agree h didn't seem to hurt him)... its the fact he attempted to thats the problem.

Like I said, attempted eye gouging should be an 8 game minimum ban (this mean attempted, not actually succeeding in causing damage).. if he had actually caused permanent damage to Harrison eyes he would be lucky to play rugby ever again if it was up to me.

news flash!

hock has been caught sniffing battery acid after the defeat at warrington!


















































police plan to charge him!