Bazinga,

and although it is not an animal, Hudds are the giants, and before that they were the Sheffield Eagles.

That's why I said 'almost every', smart . Plus, you just got served by Biff!



EDIT: I said a-r-s-e, not 'booty'. Stupid swear filter making me look incestuous...

Well he accounted for 2 out of 5 I suppose....

well wigan adopted the warriors and salford the ty i mean city reds, and well st helens just went with saints and that stupid flaming stick figure with a halo and rugby ball.

5/5

Not animals though, I'm afraid.

ah but saints have got st bernard!

Really? how shocking, i can't believe i never mentioned it before.




I wish you would have been there to teach me what was an animal and what isn't.

I don't want to start tension but why did you mention it then?

You were just saying 'I know this isn't relevant but I can name all the teams in super league'

We were referring to teams named after animals and wigan, sts and huddersfield aren't. It is that simple! No 5/5 rubbish. You might has well have told us what you had for dinner.

I believe at one point that Warrington were rumoured to be contemplating Warrington Sharks when there were loose talks of a tie-up with Sale RU.

No he wasn't, he just named the teams that weren't animals. Nothing awkward about it.

No, the original point was that since the intro of SL that each team adopted an animal or figure to go with their team, and someone pointed out the teams without animals, yet i pointed out that although they didn't have animals they had adopted something else instead. It's that simple.

You say that i may as well have told you what i had for dinner, but your post about those not being animals was just another you have made to add an extra post to the inane drivel you usually give us.




She's on her period mark, just trying to nit pick at every opportunity.

Do you all "pull your own wire", in Warrington ?
or do you prefer to let someone else "pull your wire" ?

Just thought I'd ask

Don't be rude. I'm not gonna argue with you. I just didn't think you had contributed anything. Never mind.

How is my post challenging your post any ruder than you interrupting a conversation between other people?

Are you always so quick to assume the high and mighty position when you realise you're wrong?

Also, it's not just me that can see how pointless YOUR post was, hence Mark's post.

Alright with the willy-waving guys. Jeez I didn't mean to start such a conflab

Not to highlight myself as what you called me in this post; I do feel the need to ask if you know what the word forum means? I'll give you 5 mins to find a dictionary and look it up.

Okay? See it wasn't a conversation. That is what pm is for. Any way, if you felt I was rude I apologise. I obviously found your post hazey and poorly constructed. If not I wouldn't have corrected you. Fair?

And i ask you again, what did it have to do with you? She made a point, i countered it with another, you took dislike to it, and i called you on it. Then you jumped on your horse and are now trying to get higher and higher on that horse before realising how pathetic it was of you to make your comment in the first place.

Also as you were so quick to point out, this is a forum not an english exam, so why would the hazy construction of my post be of importance. That is not what your original problem with it was, it followed on from a post before, which you overlooked, so i highlighted, and then all of a sudden you became defensive and decided to criticise the post. Here's a tip for the future, if you don't want people to respond, then don't post.

I think jdrocket thinks you're somebody else, seems to be on a massive mission to fall out with you over simply naming the teams that weren't animals, nothing nasty, sly or cocky about it. I'm puzzled to say the least,

As am I. Oh well, leave him to it I guess, Off to work.

I'll just point out I didn't dislike what you said (until you resorted to insulting me personally) I was just questioning what your point was. As I said originally, someone said all super league teams had animals in the name,then someone countered it and then you said what the names of wigan, salford, hudds and salford were.

I still don't understand what your point was. Either way I don't care. You have become very defensive yourself though. I thought I was being helpful and you respond with insults and sarcasm.

(Mark, I wasn't implying anything was awkward. I was,kt trying to be a smart arris, I promoise.)

Shall we call an end to it? I probably won't respond again to this childishness either way.

Bet you will

my 8 year old son has never referred to us as the wolves,it is come on wire/wires he shouts at the game,he will be shouting it with gusto tommorrow,we used to make a lot of hammers and pins in olde warrington too!

Once again, i haven't insulted you at all. So chill your beans. Secondly, rather than reading one post of mine and making judgement on it, see what else i had posted in the thread and you will fully understand the relevance and save us all of this hassle. Once again, i hope this reaches you on your high horse because my god you have something unsettling you.

Add to that:

Nevermind, i can't be bothered at all. You read my post wrong and that is the end of it. Done.

The word giant has many meanings, in this context though, i would assume it means a loving massive person. People are animals, so therefore giants are animals.

By my own reasoning, warriors are also animals.