Quote ="ST_CONROY"Firstly i think Morley will win MOS especially if Wire win the cup and have a good run in the play-offs.
However, Graham is the best prop forward in the league by an absolute mile.
Why would you prefer Carvell, Morley or Peacock when Graham passes the ball [iand[/i makes a hell of a lot more yards than any of them as a clasic prop forward?
'"
Graham doesn't make more yards. He makes less yards per carry than most of the big props.
The difference is that Saints have no rotation in the front row, meaning that he plays for a hell of a lot longer than any other prop in the league, hence being top.
The accurate measure for metre making is metres per carry:
Graham - 4049m - 562 carries - 7.20 per carry
Peacock - 3135m - 433 carries - 7.24 per carry
Morley - 2673m - 329 carries - 8.12 per carry
Clough - 2651m - 319 carries - 8.31 per carry
Mason - 2579m - 328 carries - 7.86 per carry
Lynch - 2555m - 368 carries - 6.94 per carry
Burgess - 2423m - 348 carries - 6.96 per carry
Carvell - 2280m - 273 carries - 8.35 per carry
Crabtree - 1748m - 205 carries - 8.53 per carry
There is no doubting that Graham is a class player, but people look at the total metres made stat, and it doesn't tell the full story. There are 6 props in the above list (a sample of the best in the league) who make more yards per carry. I want a prop to take the ball up and make the hard yards, not fanny around thinking they are a scrum half.
As you can see Clough makes some great metres per carry, and he probably benefits from being spelled, whereas Graham is being asked to do too much by his team. IMO he would be a more effective prop forward if he was spelled.
Saying that, in 2007, when he was way down the metres made and carries list, his metres per carry was still around 7.27m. The fact is, he
isn't the best metre making prop, not by a long way.
EDIT: In the past few years we have seen Terry O'Connor, Jamie Thackray, Danny Nutley sit around the top of the metre-making list, were the Saints fans singing their praises then?