Well said.

The only slightly dodgy decision was the Gleeson incident but for me it was 50/50 and could have gone either way. Some you win some you lose.

Don't know who was saying Solomona's should have been awarded at the end, but on behalf of all Warrington fans who have vision, I ask you to stop. It was never a try. Clearly a knock on.

All in all I have no problems with Sat, we got a couple of decisions are way when we could have been done for ball stealing on another day.

Great game and worthy of a grand final if both teams can meet there come October.

Knob.

Any chance you have the brain capacity to hold conversation and explain who and why????

I won't be holding my breath.

I had £20 wigan to win and a couple of quid roberts 1st try. wasnt worried even at half time. wigan just to good and deserved to win

Robbed isn't a word I'd use but on another day I thought we could have run out easy winners. Three disallowed tries by centimetres, correct decisions but on another day Wigan wouldn't have been so lucky. Great game, not too bothered by the result.

The Gleeson/King one though..I just can't see how that was given, I can't see how people think it was a try. I've seen far less disallowed and Gleeson blatantly took him out. You win some, you lose some but for me that was never a try

Robbed is what happened to the Giants at wembley last year.

You lost a league game we lost the cup. Get over yourselves and concentrate on your excuses for next week aFTER YOU LOSE.

hERE ARE A FEW TO START YOU OFF.

! HUDDERSFIELD ARE ALWAYS OFFSIDE.
2 HUDDERSFIELD SPENT ALL THEIR TIME SLOWING THE ptb DOWN
3 THE GIANTS WERE NEVER SQUARE AT THE ptb
4 We would have scored a try but there was no video ref to give it.
5 The ref was bent.
6 The ref was influenced by the home supporters. ( unlikely but nice to think one day our crowd can influence a ref)
7 We would have won if Briers was playing
8 the ref never penalised Giants players for tackling high yet sent off Morley when he quite clearly took Robinson around the legs.

Anything else you might want to whinge about

yeah - Turn your fricking Caps Lock off.

Cheated in the cup? Learn the rules son

Has this thread not ran its course yet, mods?

Like if you charge down a kick it is play on but if you then fumble it as you pick it up it is a knock on and a try should not be awarded. i know that rule it is just ganson did not.

However we got over it as it is yesterdays news.

You lot nee dto get over the fact you will never be as good as Wigan.

Now get over it and grow up son.

i get the feeling being a moderator on an internet forum is your greatest achievement in life.

now please go back to your sply populated forum you utter dullard.

Huddersfield were comprehensively outplayed in that game. It appears you need to take your own advice.

Could be a first coming up here, a Mod banned?
The Solo 'try' certainly wasn't a try. He lost it just before he hit the ground. The Gleeson/King thing was another matter. Stevo said on Sky that King was taken out by accident. I don't see that it matters how he was taken out, the fact was he was obstructed.
Nevertheless it was a great game by two very good sides, and not bit of dirty play on view.

But that is the point. All the VR decisions were correct. The only one was the Gleeson incident at best it was 50 / 50 or a judgement call. I think the VR got it right .

To me there was little difference in a centre running back to protect a full back catching a ball and colliding with an attacker trying to catch it. The centre may have had no intention of trying to get the ball but was entitled to be where he was. It was the same with Gleeson. He had every right to be supporting the attacker. he collided with king. The issue was of intent you cannot prove he did it deliberately as he has every right to be running where he was.

If you disallowed tries for that sort of potential infringement keith Senior would have had no career in Rl as technically he infringes about 15 times a game. he is just good at it.

I just think that to start a thread off saying you had been robbed and the only incident appears to be a 50 / 50 call is a bit sad.

Now Leeds vs Bradford at the Millenium stadium was robbery

This is all getting abit boring now

This is all getting abit boring now

I am merely stating an opinion, the same as you. Unfortunately you appear to have taken the role of judge, jury, and executioner in this matter. It may be a surprise to you, but other people are allowed to have opinions.
By the way I also accept that Wigan were deserved winners on Saturday night, I also think that we deservedly won the RL Cup (you haven't got over it, that's obvious). Having said that I must agree with you re the Leeds Bradford incident, daylight robbery.

Durham Giant in talking $hite "shocker".

Then you should go back and look at my posts after the final where i said we were on the rough end of decisions but it is over we lost we just have to get on with it as it is yesterdys news and well done to Warrington.

You obviously missed the thrust of my initial post which was that it is sad to start a thread complaining about being robbed on the basis of =#FF0000one slightly contentious decision..

If that is the definition of robbery i would hate to see this board if things really went against you hence i used the Leeds Bradford example..

But strangely none that went against Wigan. Go figure.....


To all the sporting Wire posters on here (the vast majority off what I've read so far!), Great game and we'll both be there or thereabouts come playoff time!

As above, credit to the Wire fans who have taken it graciously. Even if we'd lost in the last minute, I'd have still walked away from the ground thinking what a privilege it was to witness one of the best SL contests for a very long time. Can't wait for the next encounter already

orrell is speaking sense just take account the performance both teams put in and can't ait to go to wigan. but hudderield next so concentrate on that

by the way that was the best game i have seen in years in rugby league priviliged to witness that