so i ask again what should Gleeson have done? Should he have run out of the way giving King a clear shot at the tackle?

How many games of RL have you actually seen? Because you're coming across like this was your first TBH.

If the boot were on the other foot regarding the Gleeson incident and it had been Warrington scoring the try instead of Wigan. In the exact same circumstances i would have been mightily hacked off if the try had been disallowed.

It always puts a better perspective on the incident if you think of your team as the so-called sinners, not the sinned against.

But to certainly not go ahead and obstruct king.
and so i ask again. on your previous reply of ''Matt king could of been done for a tackle without the ball''
your saying king tackled gleeson?

Mate the ref did not give it, the video ref did not give it and the try stood. A wire player made contact with Gleeson while he was running a support line knocking him into Roberts, if that was King, which i think it was i feel there was more justification to call for a penalty to Wigan than claim an obstruction.

Thankfully the refs got it right and the rest is purely speculation. The try was correctly awarded, Wigan won and you are having trouble dealing with it, despite the evidence and facts.

How anyone can say a supporting runner is obstructing play is beyond me. If this was the case, every time someone made a break and there was more than 1 person in support, the try would have to be disallowed



Matt King tackled Gleeson as well, it's not like Gleeson stopped him from getting to Amos, King just read it wrong and had a stinker really.

As I have said on many other topics. GOOD GAME. WELL DONE WIGAN, I just think some decisions were harsh. It's called a discussions forum, I'm entitled to an opinion.

Your defence on this is getting embarrassing get off your high horse and admit Wigan beat you fairly.

I think you'll find you read it wrong.
Every time somone made a break, a supporting player did not deliberatley run into another defending player causing the defender to miss the attacker and cause a try.

As I said in many other topics and in my 2nd to last post on this topic.
WELL DONE WIGAN
GOOD GAME
Just think the ref and vref made some harsh decisions. I have my opinions, you have your opinions.

In my opinion if there was any reff bias it was for Wire.

Load of rubbish.

I can only conclude that you are Richie Mylers Parrot posting under an assumed name.

Turn it in mate and deal with it the try was a perfectly legal legitimate try.

Not sure how old you are but I would hate to have heard your reaction to Meninga bumping off Gibson in the Ashes back in the day......that actually was an obstruction and cost us the Ashes, that would have sent you into meltdown!.

How do you work that out pal?

At the end of the day. There was a try. Wire fans thought no try, wigan fans thought try.
We're entitle to our opinions. you beat us and ive admitted good game well done.

Because only you and RMP are trying to claim it was no try.

Exciting game but in my opinion not a good one, Wigan saved their by far worst performance of the year for tonight but still came away with the points, so although disappointed with the performance i am more than happy with the result.

What a stupid thread, the best team on the night won. For parts of the first half wire were outstanding, making sure that Wigan only had the ball in their half.

Once Briers went off we lost our composure, made a few stupid mistakes and as Wigan were concentrating for 80 minutes they pulled off a win. A few of our players also had quiet games.

Not had time to watch the VT of the disallowed tries yet, so I may change my opinion. But at this moment in time we should have carried on where we left off in the first half and Wigan would have been left behind.

Worst performance of the year you say!You make it sound as though 10 games have been played and maybe just maybe this was because you came up against a decent team who made you play bad so a bit of praise wouldn't go amiss if your honest like i will + say well done Wigan even though it hurts me to say so

At the game I was calling Silverwood fit to burn, the VR was wrong on at least two counts and Wigan were cheats! Watching it on TV and Silverwood didn't do too bad, the VR was spot on and the game was fantastic! I still think Wigan are going to naff off a lot of opposition fans with their lying on though!

My take (for what it's worth) on the Wigan try is that King came across Gleeson, not the other way round. Gleeson ran straight but King had to cut across him to try and get to the tackle and so ran into him.

we lost its not the end of world,the season has just started plenty of more games left.Watching the game i thought Wigan were slowing the us down at the play ther ball,because they know how dangerous Monas can be from a quick play the ball. Some refs would have penalised them some like Sliverwood let themn get away with it.Atkins looked dissappionting in attack imo,i would like to see Myler run the ball abit more.I wonder who made the call to run the ball insteaed of going for the two imo that was a schoolboy error

Right on all points. But as for the "lying on" we were punished, and thats down to the ref, so blame them.. And to suggest that only we did it is incorrect. Great game, and a great advert for the game we love....

Can't agree more. For the past season & this season so far the refs have been allowing players to lie on in the tackle without being punished. Silverwood penalized Wigan a few times in the first half, but not enough for my liking & it slows the game down. Can't imagine if Ganson was refing that he would have allowed it to happen

Edited for accuracy

IMHO it looked like king was gonna take gleeson out before he collected what may of been a pass....

its easy when your looking at it from a neutral point of view