Really? I had him down more as a port and lemon man myself.

As for Gigot, dear god no. A complete show pony and penalty machine whose specialism is chucking the ball along the floor and moaning like a gaelic Jake Connor.

I agree and not a player we need even if rated. We need a hard nosed leader of a prop a la Morley but God knows who of that ilk is available.

Actually Gigot is attracting quite a lot of interest atm. Most of the London West End theatres have put in a bid.

I suspect most of them will be waiting for Gigot.

Very good

All I know of him is he has not signed a new contract at Catalan

Open goal, thank you!

Maurice Chavalier could sing "Thank heavens for little girls" for the Andrew Lloyd Webber's "Gigot".

Over my head!

The attempt was a bit tenuous!

Does more than that, hence why he 'left' London

So on the news part of tonight’s super league match it says we in for George Burgess. Only way we get him is if his wife has every office cleaning job in Warrington

But it’s what we need (not the eye gouging or office cleaning part)

Or just go nuts with an offer and go for Sam

That is always the preferred option.

And have every troll on here wanting to know how we got him under the cap.

Nothing makes me chuckle more than some good old Warrington cap fume.

I may be wrong here but as he has not played senior rugby in the UK before would he not be an exemption in respect of the cap.

Who George...you can't mean Sam

All the burgess brothers have played senior rugby, Tom, George and Sam for Bradford and luke at Leeds, not sure if Luke played at Bradford? well i could swear they all did, i remember George went to souths and Tom stayed here for a year before going aswell.

I dont think George ever played for Bradford's first team.

The only way he would be an exemption is if George Burgess had never played RL before. As he has, he could not be an exemption in cap terms.

In fact, if he had never played a professional game in the UK, there could be an argument that says he would count on the overseas quota, as well as the salary cap.

We can’t fit another marquee player in, unless the rules change, the question is, if they did change, would George Burgess be a good use of that third spot?

We need his exact type of a proper big unit in the middle who’ll make big impacts in defensive lines.

That, Widdop, and a proper centre are where we’re short.

I think we need at least one prop if not 2.
No way is Tasi an improvement on George King. Westwood still plagued. BMM 10 minutes of Try-Knock on-penalty isn't good enough.

What do you mean “plagued”?