Whats that meant to mean.Imo Harrison is not a Lf

in che's opion he is, and i think che knows a lot more than you.

He played their against Wigan and Leigh so i'm guessing he is.

take no notice ray. think he a bit dopey.

warringtonwolves.com/rhys-evans-51

warringtonwolves.com/rhys-evans-51

like one of the seven dwarves.

As a long term solution that's a plausible shout... I guess I was angling at this season.

Is twelve months long-term?

Probably not... If you think he will be in the first team by the start of next season... Be great if smith thinks he is good enough to step up to the first team by then.... I hope that's the case... He shows great promise.

Ben Harrison is a Second Row/Prop.... he played LF last year as Vinnie Anderson picked up an injury and unfortunately for him couldn't regain his place when he was fully fit.

I agree with this. As second choice though I would definitely put Hicks there and Riley on the wing.

AND WHY CUOLDNT HE REGAIN HIS PLACE THEN HEY??????

Quote ="Latchford Wolvesfan"Ben Harrison is a Second Row/Prop.... he played LF last year as Vinnie Anderson picked up an injury and unfortunately for him couldn't regain his place when he was fully fit.'" not according to 'the offical' hes isn't... warringtonwolves.com/13-ben-harrison-9 the bottom bit.

Quote ="Latchford Wolvesfan"Ben Harrison is a Second Row/Prop.... he played LF last year as Vinnie Anderson picked up an injury and unfortunately for him couldn't regain his place when he was fully fit.'" not according to 'the offical' hes isn't... warringtonwolves.com/13-ben-harrison-9 the bottom bit.

Mathers for FB - I prefer Mathers to Riles at FB. Riles to Mathers on wing.

Ben Harrison Prop???

Ha ha ha ha ha ha

Because Harrison was playing so well at loose forward.

Class player, as I have been saying for the last year.

Im still Struggling to think when he has ever played prop?

and this pre-season he's been keeping the spot warm waiting for the Kevin Sinfield signing to be announced?

Do you know why we let Sinfield play for Leeds on Friday? It would have been a disaster if he got injured for leeds and missed all our season. I assume his signing will be announced in the Guardian on Thursday ready for our season to start.

Quote ="Paul Youane"and this pre-season he's been keeping the spot warm waiting for the Kevin Sinfield signing to be announced? Do you know why we let Sinfield play for Leeds on Friday? It would have been a disaster if he got injured for leeds and missed all our season. I assume his signing will be announced in the Guardian on Thursday ready for our season to start.'" Another one derailing threads with the Sinfield subject.... if you need my answer then ive replied on this one before it was locked... viewtopic.php?f=21&t=442659 .

Quote ="Paul Youane"and this pre-season he's been keeping the spot warm waiting for the Kevin Sinfield signing to be announced? Do you know why we let Sinfield play for Leeds on Friday? It would have been a disaster if he got injured for leeds and missed all our season. I assume his signing will be announced in the Guardian on Thursday ready for our season to start.'" Another one derailing threads with the Sinfield subject.... if you need my answer then ive replied on this one before it was locked... viewtopic.php?f=21&t=442659 .

Since when were you a mod Latchy?

It makes me laugh that you talk of derailing threads, yet you are talking about the lock position on a full back thread. Baffling.

I've made one comment in reply to somebody that was on about the LF position, it's hardly a complete change of subject is it and I'm not pretending to be a mod just giving him some useful advice

What do you think about Mathers at Full-Back

My point was, you can't expect a thread to stay on the entire topic, otherwise most would only be a page or two long. Threads drift and, to be fair to Paul, he was replying to your views on the LF position.

I'm not too fussed, really. Ideally, we'd have Brett Stewart there with Hayne as his back up, but that's fantasy stuff. I think we have a solid backline, Mathers is a solid player, sure, he could be better, but he's a marked improvement on Reardon IMO.

Yea ill give you that just not sure he's up there with Brent Webb, Clint Creenshields and Brett Hodgson in what i think is a vital role within the team.

To be honest, it seems that every position on the field is becoming a key position, even the interchange players are considered 'key' in changing a game. As nice as it would be to have the league's top players in every position, sometimes you have to accept a lesser player for the strength of the rest of the team. Mathers isn't poor by any means, I'm happy with him, we could improve but we could be doing much worse. We have a committed player who the coach likes a lot, that'll do me.