Must be true then

Agar tells us every week he has a game plan, so i wouldn't believe anything he says

I don't think it would be a bad signing, but we certainly wouldn't be signing the Lockyer of a couple of years ago, perhaps last season even. He seems to have lost that zip that gets him out of situations where he is being rushed on the last tackle.

I don't think he would come here for less than a two year deal, I couldn't see him getting anything more than twelve months from us.

But as I said, I just can't see him leaving Brisbane.

That's pretty much what Bennett confirms that in his latest book.

www.warrington-worldwide.co.uk/a ... Page1.html I'll have to ask Tony to look into his crystal ball again!

www.warrington-worldwide.co.uk/a ... Page1.html I'll have to ask Tony to look into his crystal ball again!

Myler is first on the list, if not JT this is my prediction for next season forget Lockyer

I heard Sullivan is coming back as he can't get a game in Australlia. (HKR i hear favoruites).

Jonathan Thurston? He's in a different Stratosphere to Richie Myler, no comprison between the two.

Why we signing John Terry?

he wants to be closer to that tranny who was in the guardian.

He needs two jobs for the extra income to pay off his mums shoplifting fines, and also wants to move to the region that have elected 2 MEP's from his favourite political party.

Maybe wigan dont want him.

He's having quite a good game.

wood

I thought he was nothing more then solid myself. Only ever noticed him when he was kicking, obviously would have put a lot of work in defence though being on the full 80 and didn't make any error's, but still wouldn't say anything more then an average game.

I don't see where he would fit in here. I wouldn't start him over Louis, Westwood or Harrison for the sole purpose of his kicking, so it would leave him and Vinnie fighting it out for a spot on the bench, and with him being more of a 70-80 minute workhorse I see no sense in that.

Obviously if he does sign then it will be as a replacement for Johnson, but the good thing about Jonno is that he can play in the backs, not just the backrow.

Ditto, ive never viewed him as anything more than that. Our 2nd row needs far more impact than Danny Tickle, we need a back rower that has pace and can punch holes in defences on a regular basis and cause defences problems, that isn`t Danny Tickle.

I doubt he'd be the 80 minute workhorse at Warrington that he is at Hull, though, thus allowing him to have a greater impact in shorter bursts throughout the game.

I agree, he's over utilised there, clearly.

From last night, what he can do better than our current back rowers is stand in the tackle, attract three players and get an offload away. Not something that Westwood & Harrison do just now, do. He runs some clever lines too, looks quite difficult to pick up, he's playing on the right fringe now, but with Westwood there, you'd think he'd start on the left fringe.

He didn't sparkle or anything last night, sure. We're only looking a little harder for obvious reasons. In the bigger picture, I've seen enough from his to suggest he'd got a better rugby brain that any of our backrowers just now. He's probably got better hands too, you could play him at 13 and he'd get involved. I don't see him as a powerhouse, he's more of a Wilkin for me, bit of guile, bit of nous, gets through his work, teammates will appreciate him, would make a go of it in four or five positions and he'd do a job for you at stand off with a simple kicking game.

Bad news for you that Smith stated he's not coming. Smith had no reson to deny the report if it's not true. Another load of bull by the NOTW

Hmmmm.

Smith never said he was not coming, he said we have not signed him.

No better than what we already have apart from his goal kicking.

Tickle is a player that wont take us forward, end of.

This was the treatment that Hicks got.

But in the future, Hicks wouldn't necessarily be the type of player that we should be looking at signing.