well actually i did a posted it on here last night a few days and a few months ago you may have read it, it came from leneghan no less he told my source in oz at world cup "you'll be gettin him sooner than you think"

OK - not read all of the posts on this thread, but overall they are very positive about the appointment.

IMO

Did Lowes have to 'go'? Yes

Have we replaced him with the right man? We've replaced him with the best available at this time, but I have my serious doubts as to whether it'll work out. (England debacle in the World Cup). Ideally the 'world class coach' would have been brought in at the end of the 08 season.

How will it work out with Lowes in the camp? The players didn't seem to gell with Jimmy overall. I can see there being some festering issues here. It's a very unusual situation and to be honest it reminds of the situation when Anderson went and Plange took over - he was on a hiding to nothing.

What should we expect this year? There will be a 'new boy' bounce so we'll win a few but I'll be surprised if we finish higher than I predicted at the start of the season - which was 6th.

So overall I can't say I'm overawed, but I'll go with a half full glass rather than half empty.
I still think the full glass is still some way off.

Brilliant news. Well done to the club. Now its the turn of the fans to, once again, get behind the team, starting on Sunday.

Now the wire........

A good appointment from the board. Hopefully this will, in time, be the start of us finally fulfilling our potential.

Sadly there was a mass expectation generated 2 weeks before the season started based on nothing at all really, other than we'd all missed watching wire for a few months. I'd imagine expectation will go through the roof with us having appointed a proven coach. But it will take us ta while to see the benefits.

Smith has many great qualitites as a coach, but as I mentioned last week, hiw style is completely the opposite of Lowes. Lowes wanted the Bradford of yesteryear - 5 drives & a kick. Smiths teams are based on agile, ball playing forwards, quick playe the balls. It'll take us about 5-6 weeks of unlearning everything we've done pre-season before we see the difference.

Would imagine one or two players have bunny bums about this appointment. Think there may be a bit more restriction on the good life until they earn it under Mr Smith.

Just like to point out i agree with wires71, ludicrous to delete a radio manhester thread that lets people on a rugby league forum about a rugby league program that's on especially as it featured warrington so much, i've not looked but i suppose the boots'n' all thread has disappeared to.

Just checked , no it's still on. Presumably because it was started by somebody that doesn't work for sky?

Agreed. Until the current regime is deposed, I suggest a boycott of this forum.

FREE WIRES 71!!

Quote ="gary numan"Just like to point out i agree with wires71, ludicrous to delete a radio manhester thread that lets people on a rugby league forum about a rugby league program that's on especially as it featured warrington so much, i've not looked but i suppose the boots'n' all thread has disappeared to.'" If it's concerning you that much might i suggest you contact the admins at admins@rlfans.com it's their site, their rules, as which we all agreed to adhere to when when we signed up.

Quote ="gary numan"Just like to point out i agree with wires71, ludicrous to delete a radio manhester thread that lets people on a rugby league forum about a rugby league program that's on especially as it featured warrington so much, i've not looked but i suppose the boots'n' all thread has disappeared to.'" If it's concerning you that much might i suggest you contact the admins at admins@rlfans.com it's their site, their rules, as which we all agreed to adhere to when when we signed up.

I dont personally disagree with you but the Admins (Site Owners) have asked us to delete threads advertising BBC Radio Shows. We are only doing as asked. If you wish to take it further please email one of the site admins,

Quote ="Tony Catsmith"If it's concerning you that much might i suggest you contact the admins at admins@rlfans.com it's their site, their rules, as which we all agreed to adhere to when when we signed up.'" Let's be honest for a moment, many many things against the aup are posted on here averyday that are left alone.

Quote ="Tony Catsmith"If it's concerning you that much might i suggest you contact the admins at admins@rlfans.com it's their site, their rules, as which we all agreed to adhere to when when we signed up.'" Let's be honest for a moment, many many things against the aup are posted on here averyday that are left alone.

I'm suprised by that. I could understand bbc shows that have nothing or a tenuios (sp) link to RL but this particular post has lots of relevance to this board.

This was a specific request by the admins posted only today.

Fair do's, if that's what you have been told to do, did you not point out the double standards to the admin team?

yes

I actually danced a jig when I heard that.

A real, honest-to-goodness jig!

Well done the club, they answered my despairing "where do we go from here?" in emphatic style.

Considering that Real Radio are a sponsor of the site its hardly surprising, or unusual, that they do not wish a "rival" to be able to get free "advertising" on the Site. That's life.

If wires71 stands for his year of birth which I think it does I suggest he should had acted his age rather than acting like a spoilt brat who didn't get the hat he wanted in the dressing-up corner at nursery school.

Is that yes and yes?

[url=http://tap20.blogspot.comSo[/url [url=http://tap20.blogspot.comwe're[/url [url=http://tap20.blogspot.comnot[/url [url=http://tap20.blogspot.comallowed[/url [url=http://tap20.blogspot.comto[/url [url=http://tap20.blogspot.comadvertise[/url [url=http://tap20.blogspot.comon[/url [url=http://tap20.blogspot.comthe[/url [url=http://tap20.blogspot.comsite[/url [url=http://tap20.blogspot.comwithout[/url [url=http://tap20.blogspot.comapproval[/url [url=http://tap20.blogspot.comfrom[/url [url=http://tap20.blogspot.comthe[/url [url=http://tap20.blogspot.comadmins?[/url

See You Soon.

I think we could be looking for a new half back sooner rather than later.

To explain the situation.

RLFANS.COM is a free to access site which is run on a non-for-profit basis.

To enable the network to run for all, without the requirement for user subscriptions, there is a necessity to raise revenue to cover the not-insubstantial cost of the servers and various licenses required to keep the site alive.

We raise this revenue thanks to a number of kind and generous sponsors, without whom the site would have been closed down a number of years ago. These sponsors have paid for the right to advertise their services and products across the network and therefore have every right to be aggrieved if their competition advertise for free without censure.

Advertising is available to all, and at [url=http://viewtopic.php?t=53301extremely reasonable rates[/url. Without these advertisers there would be no RLFANS.COM.

I hope that you can therefore understand why we have had to take the actions to remove non-sponsor advertisements.

Heres hoping.

And on that note I will lock this thread.

Free advertising?

Great news about Smith! Geordie...posting at half two?! We all knew by then