lol.... ok

Hill with his elbows below his own nipples, doing a 'red card high tackle'.

all that picture does is back up my statement that he was sent off for the outcome of the tackle and not the actual tackle itself... you actually saved me a job, as i was about to go and look for that picture.

if you cant see that, then off you pop son.

So explain to me what the outcome was then bearing in mind that whether or not the player is going down is completely and utterly irrelevant

the outcome was that the referee, who had a terrible game, sent off a player for accidental contact with the head.

if the player jumps up and shakes his head like Daryl Clark would have... its a penalty and no one is overly bothered about it.

the thing you seem to be failing to grasp is that the sending off is a result of the injury NOT the tackle.

its not that difficult a concept to grasp.

Whether the contact with the head is accidental or not is also irrelevant.

The referee did have a terrible game yes and the VR would have had a say in the sending off so not all on Kendall.

you're either unable to read the actual question im putting to you, or you dont know what to say, so you're just saying random things like some weird RL politician... either way, i wont be replying again.... if i was you i would give up this new internet trolling career you have come up with...as its really not working for you.

None of us have an issue with the red card.....so long as every head shot is a red card too.
Many Wire were miffed about the poor referee standard across the game.

Have you even asked a question? It just seems to me like you're defending the indefensible.

You never looked like winning the game, using the 12 man excuse only lasts for so long, we managed to beat you with 12 men before, and we was 20 points behind at the point. You’ll be in for a long season judging from your performance last night

The ref was both ways. Some truly head scratching calls.

I would also expect any tackles such as Hills to be a red card.

Head tackle...not just those like Hill...but any. The lot.

If they direct contact (not bounced up off the ball or shoulder or chest etc) then they should be yeah

where do you stand on attacking players raising the point of the their elbow above their shoulder, then driving it into the neck of the opponent, as they run at them?

Didn't Nick Fozzard make a career from this with you guys?

its ok... you dont need to turn up and try and help your fellow troll......im sure he can speak for himself.

Looks like Wetherspoons are kicking out.......normal people would just go for a kebab

Attacking players lead with their arm/shoulder all the time. If that becomes the elbow then it's foul play. If it's deliberate then it should be a red. The difference in that and the contact with the head rule, is that one allows for an accidental occurence and one doesn't.

If you're talking about the incident I think you are, then he will probably be told off by the powers that be and told to watch his technique because I don't think itbwas deliberate.

thanks for clarifying.

Pleasure. The laws of the game are all online for you to read. You'll probably enjoy games more if you know them

Do you go to games or just watch them on TV? I'm just curious if they let you in on your high horse.

I have to leave it outside

I like an egg who can take a yoke.

Translation: The wrong decision against Wigan was OK because it was in Wire's favour whereas the (as it turns out) correct decision against Wire was not OK because it went against Warrington.

OK mate.

When your biggest cheerleader Phil Clarke says Warrington were much the better side on the night, then it's probably true.

How dare you.
Phil Clarke is totally neutral in ALL his utterances
He wouldn't dream of showing ANY bias to ANY side, regardless if he has a poster of them on his ceiling. His sons Ellery, Shaun and Maurice are cut from the same cloth.

I like the fact that Wigan only had 2 interchanges means they were on the back foot as much as we were. This ignores 1) on the sending off we were down to 3 interchanges and 2) the fact that Burgess wasn’t fit to play should have been obvious, it looked like they had been feeding him up ready for market.
Oh, and given their stance on how they would have won the GF if Flower hadn’t been sent off smacks of hypocrisy.