Due to the amazing scenes involving Ronnie O'Sullivan today I started to think, which is the hardest to achieve, a 147 break or a 9 dart finish.

Obviously there are more shots to complete a 147 break than darts thrown to complete a 9 dart finish so I sway towards the 147, but then I start to think that the targets in darts are so small with very little room for error.

I thought about including a golf hole in one but I believe this can be achieved by luck, by a novice or amateur whereas to complete the other 2 surely you have to be of a very very high standard.

Over my head sorry

I'd say a 9 dart finish.

You should have just picked one and stuck to your guns

9 dart finish deffo.

147 just to go against 74' lol

And for that you get...

"Blonde in stupidity shocker - AGAIN!"

9 Dart finish, due to the size of the target, and the fact that the size of the treble 20 is decreased every time a dart hits it.

147 is just too easy...

Must say I was expecting more of a split than we have so far. Only one person said 147 and in all honesty she thinks that is a bus from town. ( only joking )

9 dart finish for me , both great achievements but i like the reactions to a 9 darts finish everyone just goes crazy haha never been to a darts event yet but ive told me brother get us tickets to the darts at blackpool!

a hole in one is just luck.

i'd go 147, the fact you have to think ahead, plus work out angles and speed.

I did a 12 dart finish once that's only 3 off, but my highest break is around 30 so for me 147.

but what about a 300 in bowling ?

Great debate!

Highest break in snooker is 66.

Best darts finish is over 20

id go for a 9 darter.

however winning the challenge cup then retaining it the following season takes some doing, you got to be good to do that.

Both very difficult really,
You cannot really comment until you have threw a dart,or potted a ball on a snooker table.
I get excited if i pot red and then a black,i would go with a 147 break in snooker just for the concentration levels alone but they are both great to watch.

147 by far. with a 9 darter, you practice aiming at the same thing over and over and that NEVER changes. You dont have to account for any other factor other than your own focus, whereas for a 147 you have to pick it up from possibly anywhere, allow for an unlucky kiss etc, and work out different angles for EVERY single ball.

I have come closer to a 9 darter than a 147. And that wernt too close in either tbh!

For professionals Yed it's a walk in the park. Might be tough for amateurs or novices. People like Paul Moor can hit 300 every week. I've seen it done week in, week out watching the PBA Tour.

In my opinion, a 9 dart finish is a lot more difficult than a 147 break. Yes, the 147 requires more shots, but you have more targets to aim for. With a 9 darter, you only have specific targets to aim, and they are a lot smaller than the snooker targets.

And as for Ronnie O Sullivan, I'm not even going to waste my energy talking about that tool.

ronnie o'sullivan is a genius and probably the best ever snooker player. he has just got that arrogance which makes him so good. asking whats the prize
for 147 when only few balls pocketed that's amazing!

I know where you are coming from, but i don't see how a hole in one is classed as luck. Surely, if you are on the tee of a par 3 you are aiming for the pin and if it goes in the hole it has gone exactly where you intended. Anyway, as i have hit a 180 in darts but am crap at snooker i will say a 147 is much harder.

a 9 darter simply because Phil the power taylor is awesome and a decent bloke, and Ronnie O sullivan is the biggest cock walking the planet If he wants to feck off and do something else with his millions....(yes millions from hitting balls with a stick) then go and do it....

dont bore is to death with it. its every bleedin year ohhh ive had enough of snooker ....blah blah, no one's watching the sport...balh blah ...no prize money.....moan moan.

great give me your stick i'll snap it then you can sod off you odious whinging turd.



what were we talking about.....

O'Sullivan, great player - zero class. Mind you his parents are worse.

Winning the jackpot on the millionaire game in the pub, only seen it done once, collective effort with me getting the jackpot question

Doesn't Phil Taylor have millions from throwing something at a board?

oh yes, and my god does he put the practice in,, he practises for more hours in a week than you or me or anyone on this forum works in a week.

the greastest world champion of any sport of all time is phil and the likes of in any sport will never be seen again. LEGEND.

Agree with that. Over eight hours a day practise he puts in.

can't belive my interlect is being questioned