Ratchford charged, so that's him out on Saturday
[urlhttp://www.rugby-league.com/article/40333/disciplinary-three-players-charged[/url

Interesting that Marshall didn't get cited for that blatant shoulder charge in stopping the flying pig from scoring. Seems that Redhall and BBC commentators didn't even notice it....funny that

Next time don't trip them, stand on them as Sam Powell only got a caution for it.

Do you think there is institutional bias or favouritism?

Johnson or Dagger to full back?

If Hiku is going to play, I'd rather him play in his intended position, which seems to be centre.

Our discipline has been much worse this year. The players are reacting to the pressure that they are under. The trip was obvious and pathetic. I'm not surprised that there is a likely ban.

Neither i would hope... just inconsistency. Im sure if it had been a sky game they would have referenced it and rightly or wrongly they do seem to influence which cases are reviewed by the panel.

Its bottom of the league, cheap stuff that you used to see from the likes of michael korkidas, the cheap easy stuff, thats one of the things that has ed me off more than anything during this period. Even after ratch had got off lightly with that trip on ratboy, hughes did the same thing after a knock on later in the first half. Stuck his foot out.


WHY????

That's because it didn't happen like that. Marshall didn't change his running line at all. It should never have been a penalty. The Ratchford (and Hughes) ones were blatant and deliberate and should have been at least sin binning offences.

Michael Korkidas, jeez that's a blast from the past, in the same league as Oliva Elima for dirty players. Korkidas is the only player I saw Morley refuse to shake hands with after a game, just completely bypassed each other

Blinkers from Rogues again. Marshall's was deliberate after Lineham chipped over him he turned looked right at him and deliberately obstructed him,.
I don't know why you're so annoyed Ratch will get banned as you wish.. And Powell has got away with using his studs on someone.

one in one out stupid who is it going to be this week

I don't think it was the obstruction he was talking about but rather the ball & all tackle putting Lineham into touch. From one angle I thought it looked like a shoulder charge, another showed it wasn't.

As for the obstructions to be fair Marshall's one was, he did change his line but not to the same degree as Hughes as there was also a full back in attendance unlike the Hughes one.

Looks like he is contesting it, unlike others he as not used his EGP. First up at 5 pm.

Does the match review panel still operate which might pick up a few of the fouls against our players that seem to be going unnoticed recently ?

didnt sims get a ban for standing on someone or is my mind playing tricks

1 match ban

Serves him right for wearing the wrong shirt.

Must be Agar's fault

As he challenged the ruling, rather than accepting with an EGP, does this mean if he would have submitted an EGP he would have escaped a ban?

It means he is sure he will be cleared and get to retain his EGP.
If found guilty he receives the band and forfeits the EGP.

He did plead guilty but not with intent to trip

Did Burgess get a ban for going into two tackles with his feet in the same match against Hull?.....

Did Liam Farrell get a ban last year for sliding in with his knees on Ratchford about 5 seconds after he'd grounded the ball?

Ratch should've been binned on Saturday, he got away with one, but i've never known a ban for a trip. Unless i missed one

Patton was found guilty of a trip earlier this year.

I'm getting old