I thought we were in control for long periods of the game. The try by Carvell is one I will remember for a long time to come.

I thought Ben Harrison was superb, although he misread the odd tackle, he runs his blood to water for the team.

I think we need a decent kicker as our kicking game was poor.
I was disappointed that we let them run away with it in the end.
But time to lick our wounds and soldier on from this.

That is going to be the key now imo how well bounce back from this defeat in coming weeks.

Cant agree that you were in control for "long periods" . You didnt deserve to lose by the scoreline you did , but Saints were the better side for the majority , and deserved to win imo

gutted we lost.Salford next week is a massive game a must win ,to keep up with the other teams chasing a play off berth

You were very lucky from the 30 minute mark to the 60 mark to get every possible 50:50. That gave you several repeat sets you possibly shouldn't have had and Carvell's try, which frankly was an absolute farce.

As ever getting the lead is the worst thing for you as you haven't got the leader on the field to kick on from there and as ever you stopped doing the things that had put you in the lead.

Agree on Harrison. Absolutely outstanding and a clear MOM.

Well it appears to me, that you are not giving Warrington any credit at all at 26-24 with not long to go, we were controlling things and I felt we could of and should've pushed on an won......

So to be honest I still stand by what I said we were in control for long periods of the game and it swung to youto be in control for short periods but when you had the ball you made it count that I cannot argue with. But you there for the taking today and we didn't finish off that killer blow....

So your opinion doesn't interest me to be honest, you can save it for your own forum, were I am sure they will agree with you in their unbaised way.

Haven't seen the stats but I think Wire had more possession but just lacked a cutting egde.

Dissapointing result.

seriously get a grip you had the ref in your pocket

talking out of your ricker...it was a great match...how was carvells try a farce....what was a farce was the ref with the tackle on mathers and carney but i would`nt expect owt different against you lot

Missing the Pryce high shot on Grix was the only farce for me

pryce is he the most overrated player in the game...did balls all tonight AGAIN...great againdt celtic....now eastmond...class next scrum half for england..he is english aint he

'"

I thought you bossed us for large parts of the match tonight. It was gripping stuff and probably the final scoreline didn't really reflect just how tight that match was. Both teams gave away silly penalties (and both teams got away without suffering penalities on occasion too) and we decided to lose the ball on the tryline twice, which is inconvenient for us. I think the difference lay in the ability of the teams to maintain the intensity. You fell off slightly in the last 10 but we didn't. It's what got Wakefield last night against Leeds. Leeds and Saints do seem to be the only two teams that, when on form (and we were pretty much back to form tonight after a few weeks of truly awful play), can maintain that degree of intensity for the whole 80. Either it's mental fitness or physical fitness or a bit of both, I don't know. But I really do think that fundamentally that was the difference between us. It could have gone either way for most of that match, which made it both exciting and agonising to watch! (And I only watched it on TV)

They cheered the high tackle on Graham when he was hurt so i dont see why they complain about high tackles on the dire players!

It's a Saints fan, what do you expect........

I thought you were excellent in spells and contributed to a great game, but Saints deserved tha points.

Do you disagree with that ?

And I think my comments were balanced too on the other page.

Some of us are perfectly capable of giving credit where it's due, whether we win or lose.

Now what would you have said if I hadn't have made my comment?

Warrington were good, but did they even know who our kids were before the match? If we had got beat at home and i didnt even recognise half of their team i'd be a little perplexed too!

I can form opinions based on what I see , regardless of what other fans say. I enjoyed the match , and both teams contributions to it , but am happy that Saints eventually prevailed.

The farce regarding Carvell's try was that it may have been a knock on. Result might have been a scrum down to Warrington (Stains first knock on).

That said, I think it was "right" to give it.

The ruling should have been that Carvell lost control, and as soon as it touches the ground or an opposing player, it's a knock on. However, Carvell did have the ball reefed, but managed to regain in the air. So it is one of those cloudy areas... was the ball reefed and therefore a second knock on against Saints? Or did Carvell lose control and therefore the first knock on should have been taken (which is still against Saints)?

As long as the first is adhered to, the correct response of "Play on" is fine. But like I say, it's a cloudy area. Saints fans will say it was wrong. Wire fans will say it was right. I say it was right. It damn well deserved a try.

What DIDN'T deserve tries was the number of forward passes that Saints got away with, never mind the high tackles and Pryce's interference on Carney. Professional foul, surely? Instant Sin Binning? This should have been one of those occasions where the video ref gets involved.

Never mind the vicious taking out of Grix that didn't even get PENALISED. Pryce and Wilkin doing what they always do. Dirty play and getting away with it.

Suck it up Fishface

Well, aren't you the intelligent one.

Shall I translate?

"I can't actually argue with that, let's resort to an insult of some description."

Yeah, it's only you lot who buy up expensive foreigners and turn them crap, see King and Monaghan as prime examples