While I agree with your points in principle, the chief execs role is to make the club money, to do that he has to bring in new fans. It’s then up to the coaching staff/players to win the games. Ultimately we appointed the wrong coach and have kept the wrong players. Now that decision falls on the board rather than KF - Middleton himself said Karl can only make suggestions, and the board have the final decision.
I fear that while we have a board offering massive contracts to bog standard players, nothing will change.
As people said above, a DoR with control over the coaching/playing staff and a 5 year plan is probably what we need - but will the board give up control of those decisions?
As i saw last nights game there was genuine effort put in by the players , but there were a few things that let us down.
The defence generally in the marathon six again period was ok , but was it 2 or 3 tries off kicks where there was acres of space for Cats to score because there was nobody lurking behind the line to clean up.
2 tries off basic mistakes near our own line ,dropped ball & bad ptb, Cats scored off the next plays.
Too much possession lost through basic handling errors.
Players generally need to be alert to breaks & support the ball carrier better.
I think i would definitely move Thewlis into the engine room of the team. He has more spark & nouse than our senior players.
Currie's try was well taken.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.