Quote ="lefty goldblatt"No I've not.
Read my post again. Then, if you've got the game recorded, rewatch these incidents, and compare them to the current RL rules.
The current rules state that if a ref's call is No Try, there has to be CONCLUSIVE proof to overturn it. THERE WASN'T. At no time, could you see the ball TOUCHING a single blade of grass, whilst over the line.
After multiple viewings of the Lineham effort, Hemmings and Stephenson decide to get their knickers in a twist. Yet there is no conclusive proof that the ball left his body.
I'm not really a crower, but......'"
I agree there has to be conclusive proof, and this is why we differ, because I thought Peyroux's was conclusive. You can see the ball hitting the white line. The video ref, as with everyone watching, knew it was a try and did not have the courage to overturn it. I also think Lineham's knock on conclusively dropped forward. That said, if you don't think it was conclusive then we can only agree to disagree and the scoreline is definitely conclusive.