Quote ="sally cinnamon"When the Sky coverage starts we will have enough of that from Eddie and Stevo "the best Super League ever".
Wilkin is a player, he's not a PR spokesperson for the RFL, the BBC ask him to write an article to give his opinion on the game and it's interesting to hear his opinion. People have a right to disagree with him but it reflects a view from the inside so his opinion is worth taking seriously.
Also I don't see whats so great about Leeds winning Grand Finals and Warrington winning Challenge Cups again? When the same teams win the trophies every year it's hard to believe the line that it's a competitive league and you don't know who's going to win.
You wouldn't get an Arsenal player saying yes its great to see United and Chelsea up there winning trophies.'"
But what is his opinion? He isn't clear about anything, it's just poor rhetoric that people like because its not from a journalist, though as you know it was probably ghost written anyway. I'd take his opinion seriously if he had anything serious to say, bit like when jamie peacock "speaks" and the journos fall over themselves to say how great it is that he's voicing an opinion but its invariably just a veiled moan about something that players want. Great idea of his to start the season with the magic weekend in cardiff in february. Players have their own interests at heart, which is why i take anything they say with a pinch of salt. I suppose it is better than someone rolling out the standard idioms.
Take your point on the league and cup, but we didnt win it in 2011, we were crap in 2009 and somehow beat Wigan to get to the final and were underdogs in 2010. 2012 is probably the only year out of the 3 victories that we were any good. The Grand final is different, Saints have had a hell of a run since 2006 but fully deserved it, its a format that does well for Leeds and Saints. The league is different again with five different winners in five years, with saints dominating before that.
There are lots of things wrong with the game, mainly to do with gary hethrington and his tinkering of systems to suit, but given a chance to talk about it to a wider audience why choose to be negative?