Have just had Sky Sports for two weeks now, after a long absence, and cannot believe how silly the commentary is, and rather than commentate on the game, constantly give their uninformed opinions on this that and the other.
They see similar incidents in different ways, depending on which team is involved. The "shadow" on the line was a peurile attempt to justify a try for Bulls, and the ludicrous attempt to justify Riley's "obstruction" was not only nonsensical, but showed a lack of knowledge of the rules.
As for Phil Clarke, words fail me. I have met him on a couple of ocassions and he is a really nice bloke, but his lack of skills as a neutral pundit is woeful. Grrrrrrrrr!
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
