I agree entirely. There is not a chance on earth Gleeson didn't know King was there whether he was looking at him or not. That said, me personally I would have given it 'no try'. However, I'm biased in Warrington's favour and I'm biased against Gleeson so I'll say it was a 50/50 call that you can argue either way.

Its all chip paper now but two things came to mind watching it again

1 If we had watched the play before rather than assuming the tackle was complete we would have been in position to defend the attack properly
2 The Gleeson run would have almost certainly been given as obstruction anywhere else on the park, we've all seen it happen so many times whoever we support

See you on the ice

still crying, makes the win all the so sweeter

Try.

After just seeing Leigh being penalized for an obstruction, the Leigh player was only "supporting the player" so it should of not been a penalty, so if that's a penalty then there 2nd try should not of been a try

The 'big' clubs get all the decisions go their way !!