So these player performance stats are they based on actual Super League stats and your opinions/judgments of the players



What i mean to say is, who comes up with the decision that Vinnie was the best weekly player

Er, no, the stats are based on the Opta stats.




Is it not clear enough? If you read any stat attack column, all the weeky leader's stats are shown. Then read the explanation page - each stat is awarded a score, so that players can be consistently marked. The scoring system is my own, but all the stats come from Opta off the SL website, so it's as consistent as I can make it.

Oh and I didn't say Vinnie was best weekly player - I always use the phrase "weekly stat leader" or similar, for the reasons I've talked about above.

FWIW, my MOM for Sunday was Carvell.

Obviously everybody makes there own minds up of who is good and bad but it's interesting to note that most people feel Vinnie has been one of the worse players this year and yet he's 3rd in the overall table.
Put that with the fact that the majority of fans believe Briers is the best week in week out and can do no wrong yet he's exactly half way down the overall table.

As I say, it tells you different things. With Vinnie, I think it proves quite convincingly that people who say he is lazy or only does the fancy stuff are wrong. As for Briers, I think even his biggest fans realise he has his flaws - such as missing tackles occasionally and not having the pace he used to. However, anyone with a brain and an ounce of RL knowledge can also see the quality he brings to the side.

Further proof that Vinnie anderson is a waste of money according to some.