Sibbit found not guilty of a high tackle yesterday reds.originalreddevils.com/2009/ ... le-charge/ From the Reds site; [i "Salford City Reds for­ward Ian Sib­bit was found not guilty of a charge of mak­ing a high tackle on War­ring­ton Wolves winger Brian Car­ney at the Hal­li­well Jones last Sunday. Sibbit’s chal­lenge had been placed on report by ref­eree Ben Thaler but the RFL ruled the second-row for­ward was clear to play against Wake­field on Fri­day"[/i I don't remember him being put on report? Must've been while I had my head in my hands?!

Sibbit found not guilty of a high tackle yesterday reds.originalreddevils.com/2009/ ... le-charge/ From the Reds site; [i "Salford City Reds for­ward Ian Sib­bit was found not guilty of a charge of mak­ing a high tackle on War­ring­ton Wolves winger Brian Car­ney at the Hal­li­well Jones last Sunday. Sibbit’s chal­lenge had been placed on report by ref­eree Ben Thaler but the RFL ruled the second-row for­ward was clear to play against Wake­field on Fri­day"[/i I don't remember him being put on report? Must've been while I had my head in my hands?!

so the ref gave a penalty against us for nothing, board said it was not a high tackle, before some wire with his/her drum in a twist comes on.

www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1283 According to the rfl site Sibbit has been charged with a grade b offence and faces a 0-2 match ban

www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1283 According to the rfl site Sibbit has been charged with a grade b offence and faces a 0-2 match ban

... and was found not guilty.

Keep up?!

If he was found not guilty why does it say charge next to decision?!

on the super league site it says 'no charge for sibbet'.

Are you a WUM, or just a bit slow on the up-take?

I'm merely asking a question, most of the others incidents on the RFL website say no charge, if he's been found not guilty shouldn't it say no charge?

Are you conversationally inept or just rude?

what's a WUM? out of curiosity.

Given the choices available, I'd have to say rude.

Apologies, there are so many WUMs on here that I assumed you were at it too.

Obviously, you just don't know what you're talking about.

Try having another look at the link you posted and perhaps one or two other similar links.

If that doesn't help you, any explanation I could offer will almost certainly be over your head too.

Wind up merchant

Glad it's not just me who didn't know, I'd seen it on here loads before someone explained what is meant?!

Clearly I'm missing something as I've checked the other incidents on the disciplinary page and they all say no charge apart from Tony Clubb which says charge and he has been charged!!

I can see that they're saying no charge for Sibbitt on all the other websites, my question is why?

Don't worry about offering me an explanation, I don't want to prolong my conversation with you!

'no charge' because he didn't do a high tackle..thats why!

cheers

but it doesn't say no charge it says charge, I'm not debating whether it was a high tackle or not...

I give up

maybe email them and ask why they haven't put 'no' in front of the word charge...

sarcasm is the lowest form of wit!!

I now have an answer to my question, thank you all for your lack of help

Can we stop talking "text" on here and converse in the English Language, like we did in the old days, when most people could spell and punctuate a sentence.
It drives me wild trying to work out what the abbreviations and acronyms mean.

Do you remember Steven Gerrard being locked up after he was in court last week, after being charged with affray?

See what I'm getting at?

In all honesty Sibbit ist very good anymore, Sidlow and Adamson show him up when they play, sounds bad but I wouldnt mind Sibbit getting banned if it means Sidlow gettin a game

It's also good for putting down people without a basic grasp of common sense. Perhaps, just perhaps, the person responsible for updating the website made a mistake. Maybe?

By the way, I'm presuming you're not really Chris Bridge's wife. Therefore your username is a touch on the sad and pathetic side and you're in no position to have a go at others.

Toodle-oo.

Touchy touchy!!

A simple way to answer my question would have been to say that the website hadn't been updated, instead of trying to prove how big everyones nuts were by trying to make someone look stupid for asking a simple question!

I don't give a toss what you think about my username, I personally think you're sad and pathetic and the has nothing to do with your username, it's just down to the fact that you can't have a civil conversation with someone just because they support a different club to you!

You're right. I can't. That's why I'm good friends with a number of Warrington fans. And Wigan fans. And Saints fans. And... Well, I'm sure you can see where that's going.

There's an old adage that sums up the response you got perfectly - "ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer."

Right, I'll leave it there now, I'm bored of it all.

When has Sibbit been any good?

I take it that you have not pulled there G.T?