I think to call Vidot's first try a walk in is disingenuous. Not a very difficult chance but the pass was low and in front of him and there were 3 defenders in front of him and another came across to help out. I would argue a walk in is where there's no one in front of you. To praise him for scoring two tries is no more short sighted than writing him off after his first game back from injury after 6 months, especially by people who seem to think there is no difference between fit and match-fit. Anyone who compares Vidot to junior Langi must be very short sighted cos there is a massive difference in their build
Solid but unspectacular would be my assessment of him so far which is what I would expect given he's just back from injury, his style of plat requires high fitness levels and he's had Evalds and Bibby as his centres

Agree, not going to write him off or laud him after 3 games. Hopefully those 2 trys will give him more confidence

Obviously if it's a centre it's either or both Sau and Griffin as their both only contracted for this season, aren't they?

Reading Watto's post match interviews, sounds like Vidot has returned earlier than expected and "put his hand up" when needed. Clearly he isn't injuried anymore (otherwise we wouldn't have taken the risk) but he definitely isn't fit enough yet. I again thought he was solid on Saturday, making hard yards from within our own 20 and I can see him forming a lethal combo with Junior.

I thought Vidot was solid in his performance. Anyone can see he hasn't got his match fitness back just yet. Thought he took his first try well and needed a bit of scoring to take on three committed defenders. He chimed-in plenty of times to do the hard stuff and didn't make any errors that I recall. He's growing in confidence and can see him getting better and better.

Junior Sau signed a contract until the end of the 2017 season last year.

Also whoever said his first try was a walk-in is taking the p*ss. It still took a lot of scoring, but he skittled three defenders out of the way.

I agree he had 3 to 4 defenders on him, I was amazed he touched it down

Let's remember that several Aussie players have taken a season to settle to the European game without the added challenge of a long injury.

Gee Whiz, Vidot's first try gets more exaggerated by the post. There were three defenders on the back foot to which Vidot took the route in between them all.he didn't skittle them at all. He took four strides then dived to score, Junior Langi would have scored, it was a walk in. [url=http://www.skysports.com/rugby-league/salford-vs-widnes/report/44437Clicky[/url

The try took some scoring,many players would not have managed it,it followed a good pattern of play which put the defenders in a position that Vidot took advantage of.

Are you related to Lance Todd by any chance?

I realize all you want to do is antagonize

Stan's never been wrong. Ever.

Can tell you Two never played the game.

Cheers matey,

I'm sure they'll be devastated with that retort from a person who proudly thinks the earth is a young flat disk controlled by secret societies bent on the hiding of a pretend God.

Even you must see that your judgement on nearly everything has to be pretty suspect...

Oh dear. TheButcher derails the thread yet again how surprising.Shame you continue to muddy these boards due to your boredom.Whats happened to your forum. Its not had a post for 23 hours.

I thought it was a valid point, after all, if your judgement on reality is so off why should anyone take your sporting knowledge as anything but flawed?

If you don't want it bringing up then just stop shoving it in peoples faces on your signature. After all, it's not a free advertising space for delusionals.

I don't have a forum btw, Stan. It's not mine. But it's nice to know you lurk there.

Hahaha love it when you get all personal. Shows your immature vexed personality. My signature isn't breaking any rules, however, you clearly are derailing this thread. As for your poxy forum, I simply just popped my head over to prove a point. Now go on toddle off or stick to the thread. Cheers.

FS how do you know if either of us have ever played the game or not?We only have your word for it that you have,come on give us a clue who did you play for and when?
Does it make a difference if we played or not?
Are you related to Lance Todd or not?

If someone wants to tell Vidot his pet cat could have scored those tries , let me know so I can be there to watch ?

[url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e89H7zFqyPwVidot Try Manley 2015[/url

[url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j86bMUtzde4Vidot Steamrollers Widdop[/url

[url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upm6e5uDjNoVidot try saving tackle[/url
[url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhaeXrBTNkMvidot try Canberra[/url
this is what he can do when fully fit , I'll wait until then to pass judgement

Any who, let's get back on track ( yet again) I thought Vidot did a lot of work and was a 7 out of ten. He's improving every match and as his fitness and understanding of plays improve I think he's gonna be a good signing for us. He's no Carney but then again there's only one of them!! Before we lay into our new guy, lest we forget Carige !

You derailed it yourself by belittling others opinions rather than have a decent discussion. You just don't like it when someone does it back to you.

Btw, your signature is breaking the rules. The rules of physics and relativity.

I ain't questioning the Old NRL Vidot. I'm questioning the pudding he is now. Simple walk ins don't cut it with me. And I'm sick of all the parroting about his fatigue. He's a winger for goodness sake, not a bloody back rower. He should be fit by now. Period. Didn't take Carney long with his fitness did it.

Once again another thread ruined.

Cheers