And the point I'm making is that there was universal praise when we signed someone who would set Super League alight.
Both positions are very important in the modern game but we'd signed a superstar and it is only with the benefit of hindsight that you can be preferring a hooker,because the Locke signing didn't work out.
Also,you can only sign players who are available
It's got nothing to do with the fact the Locke signing didn't work out. I'd take a worldly 9 every time but that's just my opinion. I also appreciate that one may not have been available when we signed Locke. What I'm saying is if we signed one now it could make a big improvement to the team going forward.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
