If he tackles like Patten,he will be faulty towers,not the recruit to drag fans to the ground,Vievers said he is good
enough for the N,R,L,so why is he playing in France.

Phil Veivers was quoted as saying " I have been told that he is good enough to play NRL or Superleague"

Which is somewhat different than your interpretation Lance,give the man a chance please.

Which is probably what Parish was told about Jordan James.

Just pointing out the difference between Lance's statement and what Phil Vievers
was quoted as saying.

So whats the difference?

If you cant tell the difference in what Lance said Phil Vievers said and what Phil Vievers actually said, its not for me to tell you but for you to find out.

The message is no different. If you want it enough and you are good enough you will naturally progress into the first team. No player in the U20's has a divine right to make it into the first team without competition.

Cream always rises to the top. It's up to the lad in the 20's to rise to the challenge and not turn sour.

With Patten leaving surely knowbody would expect Salford to have only one young and inexperienced fullback in the squad for 2013? I really don't see the problem.

LUKE TOWERS did ok last night in the under 20s game against the Bulls and if Luke Patten is out injured next week then I think Towers should take his place against the Giants.