At this rate will we be able to field a team?

That is a joke. O'Meley got up from the play the ball and threw one almighty punch at Wild (thankfully it didn't connect) both sets of players came rushing in and it was handbags from there on in.

What about O'Meley taking Howarth off the ball early in the first half? Also what about him also taking Wild off the ball just before our 4th try I think? You can clearly see on the highlights Wild being taken out by that thug just before Gibson crossed for his second!!!

£500 for O'Meley at all yet he started it, same last week when Ah Van ran in and threw a punch nothing, must be OK to hit players at Salford.
the decision is a little confusing from RFL site
Case Number ON/573/12
Name Stephen Wild
Club Salford
Shirt Number 13
Match Hull FC v Salford
Competition Super League
Date 29/07/12
Incident considered Punching in 68th minute (O’Meley)
Decision Charge
Details of Charge / Reason for NF Rule: 15.1(a) Detail – Punching – One on One Grade A MRP - Referred to tribunal
Range of Recommended Sanctions in relation to Charged Grade* NFA - 1 match. Early Guilty Plea offered and accepted. No suspension. Not eligible to take EGP for 12 months

Not that i condone O'Meley throwing a punch, but really you need to take a look at what your own players where doing to cause this incident. FWIW the ref for me is the real reason both ended up before red hall.

I noticed a few verbals between Wild and O'Meley leading up to the incident that's all. The verbals stemmed from O'Meley hitting Wild off the ball earlier in the half, Wild then put a massive fair shot that sent O'meley flying backwards, O'Meley grabbed Wild whilst he was at marker and there was a bit of a push and shove. You get a penalty for something can't remember what it was O'Meley takes the first drive in right at Wild who again completes the tackle. O'Meley then gets up and throws a punch. I'm still confused as to why Wild has been banned?

which is my point, your only seeing what you want not what happened.

Such as?

What did happen then?

Did O'Meley take wild out when he had the ball yes or no?

Did O'Meley run at wild get put on his and get up and throw a punch as a result yes or no?

Not to mention his first half clean out of howarth.

Did wild actual do anything illegal before O'Meley swung the first punch? I fail to see why Wild has a suspension but O'Meley hasn't.

'Hull FC prop Mark O’Meley has been fined £500 for punching Salford City Reds captain Stephen Wild during his side’s 34-26 win at the KC Stadium on Sunday.

The disciplinary committee decided not to suspend O’Meley, who was sin-binned for the offence, after taking into consideration his guilty plea, but imposed a fine to reflect the potential for injury.

Wild, who was also charged with the same grade A offence of punching, was suspended for one match after submitting an early-guilty plea.'







[url[URL=imageshack.us/photo/my-images/684/omeley.jpg/

Uploaded with [url=http://imageshack.us:lf43goc1ImageShack.us[/url

Equally staggered that O`Meeley didn`t get a ban but as Wild pleaded guilty then we can`t be surprised that he got a match ban. Can`t help but wonder if he had pleaded not guilty if he also would not have got a ban.

So basically what a large majority of Hull fans were doing for the whole match on Sunday...?

Code 13 app. now saying that Wild is not banned as he entered an early guilty plea for a grade A offence.

The club have confirmed it as well on the Facebook page.

I did think it was a bit strange when I went on the disciplinary page on the RFL website and it said NFA, (i.e. No Further Action) which is usually what they put when there isn't a ban, and then 1 match suspension next to that. Possibly an error typing it up....

If you look at my earlier post from yesterday, a copy from the RFL site it clearly says no suspension, that is why I copied it, how badly run is the RFL if it can't understand one of it's own committees.
I wonder who pointed this out to them?

I'd love to know what you saw, then?

What does it matter what i saw? Wild got charged so the people that matter saw what was needed to be seen. At what point did i say O'Meley was Innocent in this he was charged, which is what i'm getting at. Wild was charged also so must of played his part. Sat in the south stand at the KC i couldn't make out if anything happened (ref cheap shots in the tackle). Clearly with you all saying Wild is innocent, shouldn't of been charge ect, means you all must have great eye sights all 5 that came that is, even better then video the match commissioner used to review any incident.


BTW if he hasn't been banned i'd say that's a good result as it was the ref who lost control causing this incident anyway. Shame we cannot ban refs lol

well clearly you have terrible eyesight, so what you say you saw we can discount, or you have a problem counting and need to go back to school.

Could you have done that without having a dig at our support? I think you could have done, couldn't you?

By the way, I was sat in the South Stand and I could see who had thrown the first punch. If you're going to suspend Wild, then O'Meley should be suspended as well. He also happened to be the one who got sin-binned, remember?

People have stated exactly what they saw, not some fantasy which paints Wild as completely innocent.

I'm thinking your not very bright.







oh dear, never mind. maybe you all should send your views to red hall and tell them too, he was charged and accepted it. Blind or not that tells you all he was guilty.

i agree both should get same punishment. As for the sin bin its always the retaliation that gets done.


You really have some blinkered fools on this board and i thought ours was bad.

I'm thinking you're thick, but I didn't want to point this out, again in your posting you indicate a need to go back to school.

This is a debate that you just can't quite grasp. Either add something that may require a brain cell or jog on

must have won then, you stated we only brought 5 fans, therefore I questioned your ability to count, you also suggested you saw something totally different to what other people saw in the same stand as you, then you make more errors and now I'm getting bored pointing these things out to you.

Wrong

You brought not many fans at all maybe 30 i didn't count, so if that's right i'm not far wrong my bad. (wasn't having a go about it btw as wouldn't be d if you brought 0).

I've never stated i saw anything, just stated what you guys are saying you saw is wrong as he got charged. (i know this is hard to swallow but its fact)

now i'm bored pointing out that you clearly are stupid..

Oof. Now [ithat's[/i unfortunate.

Keep going lad. It's going really well!